Truth and lies about the raw food diet Bashny.Net

Information about health, nutrition, raw food diet, which comes from me, is often at odds with easy, pleasant, defiantly optimistic information coming from people applying for the role of “guru” of raw foodism and earning on this topic.

My opinion and my argument will be more clear and convincing in light of the rhetorical question posed by me in one of my previous posts about 100-150-200...year old raw foodists.

You can even “sharpen” this question — raw foodists should be, at least, absolute Champions-centenarians, but in reality is not even 70-80 year old raw foodists, and those few who have, rather, are anti raw food diet.

How so, because the raw food diet should be as effective, it should be unconditional blessing!

But facts are stubborn things, and ignore them and not notice it does not — this is obviously a road to nowhere. You need to explain those misunderstood, stubborn facts, that all became clear.





If very succinctly. A raw food diet is not an end in itself, for which you should endure various uncomfortable condition. On the contrary, the raw food diet is attractive precisely because it is the only natural and therefore the most enjoyable way of eating for a person should be most effective and should lead to a sharp improvement in his General condition and a radical improvement, and ultimately lead to maximum longevity.

But! Effective long-term raw food diet is possible only on clean fruit-vegetables! But, even if you have a large abundance of clean fruits and vegetables, you need to be able to dispose of them, because not everything that seems edible and tasty and are eaten by raw foodists, in fact good for health. Same incomparably more difficult to zeroedit, if the set of products for much less, and those products are still nahimichili.

Raw food in the city for the purchase obviously impure product will go absolutely unpredictable, “through the stump deck” and directly dependent on the degree of Nacimiento products. May even be a better state of health, and a feeling of unusual lightness, and the weakening and even the complete disappearance of the symptoms of some diseases, but definitely will always be present and a significant “minus” in the mood, which seems to be clean, skillfully adjusting the power. “Close to the elbow...” — the impure product does not work, “though inside Unscrew”.

Why “guru” of raw foodism is so shamelessly optimistic? Yes, because they are made the subject of raw foodism your business — lectures, seminars, books, CDs... and so diligently to demonstrate their supposedly superior health, supposedly the absolute possession of the subject of the raw food diet, and most importantly, the opportunity to anyone who will pay for their expensive educational activities, to join the raw food diet and become the same.

Oh, you! First, these “guru” is not so perfect as they mimic with their own raw food, and they don't know why this is so, and what you need to do to be perfect? Simplistically assuming that a raw food diet is to eat raw, they don't understand that not everything edible is useful, especially in its raw form and they do not realize the critical importance of the purity of the products in the raw food diet. Some of them easily says to the audience “do not bother about purity products”. He mistakenly believes crises purification from deposits of certain “toxins” accumulated during previous years, and each successive crisis is a manifestation of a more deep cleansing of the body, and therefore talks about your recent crisis had brought him to pneumonia and forced to enlist the help of a homeopath.

Someone, losing alertness, and itself an illusion, that no one will notice, shows your photos, which show that he/she during this period was playing with it non fast food was corroded cheeks, and sides.

Secondly, knowing that questions on health/raw food diet they are much more than answers, and that they own this theme superficially, at the level of the banal performances, they know that those on whom they make money. in the end, surely, fail.

But that is not a “guru”, their goal is different — the money, if only “the people” handed over the money for their lectures, seminars..., and there... Not knowing the subject, they never take up the healing of a specific patient, and even for his business, because I know that nothing good except to discredit them it will not.





But they realized that people are simple-minded and gullible that they can be easily make money and this is not necessarily to achieve real, long-term positive results, but enough artistry. They “teach” people what they themselves have little knowledge of their path — excitable irresponsible verbiage on the theme of raw food in front of an impersonal audience, verbiage, richly seasoned with words — love, joy, harmony, happiness, light, goodness, peace....

But these “gurus” still quite young, and whether they are as optimistic and persuasive as he gets older, they will, at least, 50, 60 years?

And yet, the ornate lie “guru” on the raw food diet for many more attractive than the naked truth. Because man is so constituted, it is always nicer to hear positive — that “guru” is very well understood and used.

And the most important thing is that trying to zeroedit are mainly young people aged 20-35 years old and at this age people are often overly optimistic about everything new, including raw food diet. They are absolutely sure that they will certainly be able to implement such a tempting-an attractive idea, as the raw food diet! A resource of their body is not yet developed, and most of all, they have no serious health problems, so experiments on themselves until they are allowed and, most likely, will pass without serious consequences for their health, though, you never know.

Until the person attains personal experience, it is virtually impossible to convince of something that does not coincide with his views. Technically, it should be: the absolute self — reliance is the mechanism of evolution, that each went his own way, trusting only to the feelings and brain... that was natural selection.

Well, the “guru” of the raw food diet they then exploit this extreme optimism of the young.

Would like to be understood that in any case not to sow in someone pessimism in relation to raw food diet. A raw food diet is the only natural way to feed all the animals on earth, including man. But today we do not live in the wild, and in the present conditions of Nacimiento all agricultural products sold in the cities, trust only taste sensations not easily to be deceived and come to a standstill. Examples of feeling helpless to Orient a person very much — even in warm areas, where the abundance of pure fruits and vegetables, what malicious people do not eat, although no need for this.

Should be very carefully and clearly analyze all connected with our feelings and food, otherwise the attempt to radically improve your health with a raw food diet may collapse and turn to the experimenter with new problems.

 





And what more would you like to say — feel free to contact Your “guru”, “drew” You to the raw food diet, with specific questions on nutrition and health which You have. This should help You quickly clarify your questions, or to clarify the question about the competence of Your “guru”, which is also important, because it will reset the blinders from Your eyes and will save You from mistakes due to blind faith in “guru”.

And even if these issues will be many and from different people, it's more sober “guru” and will hold them in some degree of reckless, irresponsible verbiage. Of course, they are not the responsibility of “warranty service” converted to raw, but their lectures and seminars — it is, nevertheless, not the irresponsible one-off concert of the popular “show-businessman.” published

 

Author: Vladimir Togoev

 

Also interesting: 5 reasons to eat raw foods

The principles of healing the body: we are WHAT we digest

 



Source: v-togoev.livejournal.com/2399.html