336
Boris Bulychev: Human logic to logic is irrelevant
At the time, in the analysis of historical development of States I have the impression that the challenges of global development are rooted in some fundamental problem that mankind overlooks. The key and problematic element is the person and his logic — after all his logical abilities and capabilities depends on the conditions and methods of development of the entire environment.
Human logic accompanies us throughout life. It is good that for any situation on the basis of human logic you can prove anything. You can see how two people coming from the same situation to prove opposite things. Burning eyes, fiery speech and a fashionable tie and carry a sign of the truthfulness of the statements - do not You think that this is not normal?
No matter what, the man loves his logic. Must be very clearly understood that any act a person justifies their own logic. Only agreeing with her, does the deed, no matter what it was, and a noble feat, and petty fraud, and crime. Therefore, a person's confidence in the correctness has too little grounds.
Already the language of communication is fraught with problems that must be clearly understood. When we wish to say something at the beginning in our brain, linguistic processor generates a logical — syntactic structure that includes the phrase, and our knowledge base. Each word within the phrase associated with many concepts in the knowledge base of the person, forms a strongly connected and a large semantic structure.
When we say, cutting all communication phrases from our knowledge base and now this crap flew in all directions. It is unlikely that anyone will understand the real meaning of the phrase, this is the problem of communication. First of all, the necessary consensus for a starting situation of knowledge of the problem area, and only this will be the basis for further communication to analyse problems.
How to digest information people? Inform You of your little experiment. Try to count the number of concepts in Your memory at the moment You can speak, to verbalize, their number is small. During the development of the material in a particular cycle thinking person keeps in the active state, on the verbal level, from three to nine concepts.
These concepts are established associative connections with the concepts of the knowledge base of a person and makes some conclusion in the framework of this stage. Then the active concepts is filled with the next portion of the concepts and executed the next step of thinking. By using the field concepts of active individual analyses the information structure of the problem, successively moving along a certain trajectory.
Moving in this way information on the real structure of some problem, the person forms her image. Since the size of any problem areas is at least tens of thousands of concepts and their relationships, a narrow beam field of the active concepts will not be able in real time to scan it in sufficient volume.
But most importantly, the image of the same area of concern at each personas possible number of paths for the information structure of the problem area is sufficiently large. Different people go through the exact same problem in various logical ways, I see her differently and combined to solve even this common ground is difficult.
Additionally, the human brain is in active mode consumes 25% of the energy of the person, so it should work in start-stop mode, i.e. having worked in an extreme situation it needs to go into a relaxation mode and lie on the couch thinking about nothing.
Next, I want to offer a description of the key problem, which does not allow people to do something reasonable and while neither will be this understanding, nothing reasonable will not. Try to write a snippet of text, and within a month it regularly to read in 10 minutes in the morning on an empty stomach and 10 minutes in the evening before bed, and you will have an understanding of all the problems of humanity.
The environment in which people logically felt comfortable in the Delta technology (DT) is called the Subjective sphere of understanding (SSP). SSP consists of three sections.
The area of active knowledge (HAPS) performs the function of accumulation of knowledge, school, professional, home. HAPS is well structured, has developed Association, we are very well orientirueshsya in it.
However, each found their own and unique. What that means, yeah it's a little one, it is such a pool of knowledge where people relish shake and he feels that if he gets a sea of knowledge, it will be the same. But no, once in the sea of knowledge, one begins to sink and from it are large and meaningless circles.
The second section of the Subjective sphere of understanding (SSP) is a motivational structure (MS) which is rigidly connected with HAPS and of course she is defined as a person nothing else. MS is a system Delta of options that a person considers necessary to achieve, this is his I, his ego.
This includes such Delta parameters as increasing its credibility, level of self-affirmation, well-being, the Delta parameters of the professional areas that he believes necessary to achieve. Thus, if you try to bring in HAPS human new knowledge and he feels that this new knowledge can warp his MS, that whatever these new ideas, they will be rejected as an attempt on his Z. What follows from it.
And should the fact that human logic is to logic is irrelevant — it's just the interaction of our SSP, but in the end it is the interaction of our motivations.
The third section of SSP is called Individual Delta ring (IIR) and is a technology of ensuring the existence of man in the material and spiritual world. For example wrote a book published, received a fee, bought a sausage and ate it, and again could write a book.
People worked long and hard creating her IDK, and then jealously protects it and attempted it IDK man considers a felony. So, if you offer someone a idea which may threaten the integrity of it IDK, it will meet fierce resistance and even threats. Do not try to do or offer a person a new replacement structure IDK — maybe then he will be inclined, such a structure make.
The limitations of human logic associated with a physiological limitation on the amount of perception. Now in the Internet there are many different associations who are calling into their ranks of supporters. And imagine that it was much interested, they sent in their email address on their support and suggestions. If such senders were a million people, then only to read these letters need 166 years(10 minutes for writing, 5 hours per day and 200 days a year to do it), but we need to ensure that the interaction of tens of millions.
When solving large problems fails to properly take into account more than 30% of causal relations. If someone is trying to implement some positive task, accounting for only 30% of the logical relations does not allow to hope for the effectiveness of this task and achieve positive results.
If someone is trying to realize some negative in its essence the task, and in this case, accounting for only 30% of causality does not allow to hope for the effectiveness of this action. Thus the result of both actions just worsens the stability of the whole system and we are increasingly immersed in a state of uncertainty.
Any positive person initially tries to realize the objectives of equitable development, but this is a difficult task because of the necessity of taking into account the large amount of information, varying over time, is doomed to failure. After a few such attempts, the subject comes sooner or later to the thought of the impossibility to solve such problems and begin to solve the problem are clear and achievable — is the task of personal well-being and stability as more attainable and attractive.
People who already have experience, a priori intend to resolve only their personal problems, — that is the root of corruption, crime and terrorism generated by the senselessness of the entire architecture of life. This is illustrative of the limitations of human logic.
For those who don't agree, you can learn the Indian fable about the blind men and the elephant and then if in the morning on an empty stomach to repeat it, then after a year it is hoped to understand the meaning of this parable.
Experts monitor the environment, speaks his views and defines them as some absolute truth. They forget that there are tens of thousands of other such experts that say about the truthfulness of their views and often contradictory.
Every expert person able to read only their own works and on the other, and many other activities, he remains not just time. There would have to take and wonder what all these thousands of experts over hundreds of years, expounding on something, but that presentation here for hundreds of years there was no progress, so with an efficiency of 10 %, something reach and are very happy.
It is possible and in this way try to develop a civilization, but it will be a very long time, with unpredictable consequences, immersion in the dark ages and access to enlightenment. Not understanding the essence of the Delta rings. like a bull in a China shop, will break off the Delta ring and to generate a crisis or accidentally causes some kind of Delta ring and will think what is he smart.
You must also like watching the stars we have created a tool in the form of a telescope, as well as for lifting heavy weights, created a tool in the form of a crane, and for work with heavy and large objectives, it is necessary to create a tool in the form of tools for understanding the problems, Electronic writing and Delta network share knowledge, i.e. to develop and implement the project Delta technology.
It will allow to raise efficiency of civilization up to 80%. It is difficult to predict the value of the tool, but to understand its meaning, you can, assuming that a tool we are removing from your life and then it will be clear the meaning, and offer tools for understanding the problems. Try for example to remove from the life of civilization tools for lifting heavy weights, and you will become more clear.
Historical analysis over the last hundred years shows that only human stupidity is not an opportunity to build a reasonable condition to ensure a comfortable existence of the human community. There can not be offended, just the human brain emerged when it was necessary to solve a simple task: hunt for the mammoth to go or better to collect the roots.
We have two ways of organizing the life of civilization.
The first option is running in traditional mode of thinking of the person that will provide a comfortable life in the space of meaninglessness to which people have become accustomed.
The second option is that humanity is trying to grasp the basics of Delta technology, to understand that the accumulated knowledge of man is garbage — as a partial vision of separate fragments of the environment.
The man accepts the sentence, that all do not understand, but when he said that and you're a fool, he little thought, said, "No, I'm smart", and begins to inflate the cheeks — well, if this were so, then all we would have lived a long time very well. Do not get me wrong — I'm as stupid as you are, but I know that, and you not, but it will know you and don't tell me that you don't know.
That's what we need to overcome and after that we expect great things, we must do a lot and this will be possible. It was then, and will need the knowledge and experience of each person to be submerged in an open logical information space design of the development, revised, amended and adopted in the space of knowledge civilization.
See also:
Twice a cancer survivor, the woman talks about what nobody wants to know
What seems like a rush or life complications...
Delta technology is a medicine, though bitter, but medicine and do not be offended, because when we create and implement a project that will be able to ensure the rapid development of the state. Delta technology offers the way out of the state of senselessness and the transition to the expanse of logical space creating a new civilization.published
Author: Boris Bulychev
P. S. And remember, only by changing their consumption — together we change the world! ©
Join us in Facebook , Vkontakte, Odnoklassniki
Source: viperson.ru/articles/boris-bulyuktov-analiz-chelovecheskoy-logiki
Human logic accompanies us throughout life. It is good that for any situation on the basis of human logic you can prove anything. You can see how two people coming from the same situation to prove opposite things. Burning eyes, fiery speech and a fashionable tie and carry a sign of the truthfulness of the statements - do not You think that this is not normal?
No matter what, the man loves his logic. Must be very clearly understood that any act a person justifies their own logic. Only agreeing with her, does the deed, no matter what it was, and a noble feat, and petty fraud, and crime. Therefore, a person's confidence in the correctness has too little grounds.
Already the language of communication is fraught with problems that must be clearly understood. When we wish to say something at the beginning in our brain, linguistic processor generates a logical — syntactic structure that includes the phrase, and our knowledge base. Each word within the phrase associated with many concepts in the knowledge base of the person, forms a strongly connected and a large semantic structure.
When we say, cutting all communication phrases from our knowledge base and now this crap flew in all directions. It is unlikely that anyone will understand the real meaning of the phrase, this is the problem of communication. First of all, the necessary consensus for a starting situation of knowledge of the problem area, and only this will be the basis for further communication to analyse problems.
How to digest information people? Inform You of your little experiment. Try to count the number of concepts in Your memory at the moment You can speak, to verbalize, their number is small. During the development of the material in a particular cycle thinking person keeps in the active state, on the verbal level, from three to nine concepts.
These concepts are established associative connections with the concepts of the knowledge base of a person and makes some conclusion in the framework of this stage. Then the active concepts is filled with the next portion of the concepts and executed the next step of thinking. By using the field concepts of active individual analyses the information structure of the problem, successively moving along a certain trajectory.
Moving in this way information on the real structure of some problem, the person forms her image. Since the size of any problem areas is at least tens of thousands of concepts and their relationships, a narrow beam field of the active concepts will not be able in real time to scan it in sufficient volume.
But most importantly, the image of the same area of concern at each personas possible number of paths for the information structure of the problem area is sufficiently large. Different people go through the exact same problem in various logical ways, I see her differently and combined to solve even this common ground is difficult.
Additionally, the human brain is in active mode consumes 25% of the energy of the person, so it should work in start-stop mode, i.e. having worked in an extreme situation it needs to go into a relaxation mode and lie on the couch thinking about nothing.
Next, I want to offer a description of the key problem, which does not allow people to do something reasonable and while neither will be this understanding, nothing reasonable will not. Try to write a snippet of text, and within a month it regularly to read in 10 minutes in the morning on an empty stomach and 10 minutes in the evening before bed, and you will have an understanding of all the problems of humanity.
The environment in which people logically felt comfortable in the Delta technology (DT) is called the Subjective sphere of understanding (SSP). SSP consists of three sections.
The area of active knowledge (HAPS) performs the function of accumulation of knowledge, school, professional, home. HAPS is well structured, has developed Association, we are very well orientirueshsya in it.
However, each found their own and unique. What that means, yeah it's a little one, it is such a pool of knowledge where people relish shake and he feels that if he gets a sea of knowledge, it will be the same. But no, once in the sea of knowledge, one begins to sink and from it are large and meaningless circles.
The second section of the Subjective sphere of understanding (SSP) is a motivational structure (MS) which is rigidly connected with HAPS and of course she is defined as a person nothing else. MS is a system Delta of options that a person considers necessary to achieve, this is his I, his ego.
This includes such Delta parameters as increasing its credibility, level of self-affirmation, well-being, the Delta parameters of the professional areas that he believes necessary to achieve. Thus, if you try to bring in HAPS human new knowledge and he feels that this new knowledge can warp his MS, that whatever these new ideas, they will be rejected as an attempt on his Z. What follows from it.
And should the fact that human logic is to logic is irrelevant — it's just the interaction of our SSP, but in the end it is the interaction of our motivations.
The third section of SSP is called Individual Delta ring (IIR) and is a technology of ensuring the existence of man in the material and spiritual world. For example wrote a book published, received a fee, bought a sausage and ate it, and again could write a book.
People worked long and hard creating her IDK, and then jealously protects it and attempted it IDK man considers a felony. So, if you offer someone a idea which may threaten the integrity of it IDK, it will meet fierce resistance and even threats. Do not try to do or offer a person a new replacement structure IDK — maybe then he will be inclined, such a structure make.
The limitations of human logic associated with a physiological limitation on the amount of perception. Now in the Internet there are many different associations who are calling into their ranks of supporters. And imagine that it was much interested, they sent in their email address on their support and suggestions. If such senders were a million people, then only to read these letters need 166 years(10 minutes for writing, 5 hours per day and 200 days a year to do it), but we need to ensure that the interaction of tens of millions.
When solving large problems fails to properly take into account more than 30% of causal relations. If someone is trying to implement some positive task, accounting for only 30% of the logical relations does not allow to hope for the effectiveness of this task and achieve positive results.
If someone is trying to realize some negative in its essence the task, and in this case, accounting for only 30% of causality does not allow to hope for the effectiveness of this action. Thus the result of both actions just worsens the stability of the whole system and we are increasingly immersed in a state of uncertainty.
Any positive person initially tries to realize the objectives of equitable development, but this is a difficult task because of the necessity of taking into account the large amount of information, varying over time, is doomed to failure. After a few such attempts, the subject comes sooner or later to the thought of the impossibility to solve such problems and begin to solve the problem are clear and achievable — is the task of personal well-being and stability as more attainable and attractive.
People who already have experience, a priori intend to resolve only their personal problems, — that is the root of corruption, crime and terrorism generated by the senselessness of the entire architecture of life. This is illustrative of the limitations of human logic.
For those who don't agree, you can learn the Indian fable about the blind men and the elephant and then if in the morning on an empty stomach to repeat it, then after a year it is hoped to understand the meaning of this parable.
Experts monitor the environment, speaks his views and defines them as some absolute truth. They forget that there are tens of thousands of other such experts that say about the truthfulness of their views and often contradictory.
Every expert person able to read only their own works and on the other, and many other activities, he remains not just time. There would have to take and wonder what all these thousands of experts over hundreds of years, expounding on something, but that presentation here for hundreds of years there was no progress, so with an efficiency of 10 %, something reach and are very happy.
It is possible and in this way try to develop a civilization, but it will be a very long time, with unpredictable consequences, immersion in the dark ages and access to enlightenment. Not understanding the essence of the Delta rings. like a bull in a China shop, will break off the Delta ring and to generate a crisis or accidentally causes some kind of Delta ring and will think what is he smart.
You must also like watching the stars we have created a tool in the form of a telescope, as well as for lifting heavy weights, created a tool in the form of a crane, and for work with heavy and large objectives, it is necessary to create a tool in the form of tools for understanding the problems, Electronic writing and Delta network share knowledge, i.e. to develop and implement the project Delta technology.
It will allow to raise efficiency of civilization up to 80%. It is difficult to predict the value of the tool, but to understand its meaning, you can, assuming that a tool we are removing from your life and then it will be clear the meaning, and offer tools for understanding the problems. Try for example to remove from the life of civilization tools for lifting heavy weights, and you will become more clear.
Historical analysis over the last hundred years shows that only human stupidity is not an opportunity to build a reasonable condition to ensure a comfortable existence of the human community. There can not be offended, just the human brain emerged when it was necessary to solve a simple task: hunt for the mammoth to go or better to collect the roots.
We have two ways of organizing the life of civilization.
The first option is running in traditional mode of thinking of the person that will provide a comfortable life in the space of meaninglessness to which people have become accustomed.
The second option is that humanity is trying to grasp the basics of Delta technology, to understand that the accumulated knowledge of man is garbage — as a partial vision of separate fragments of the environment.
The man accepts the sentence, that all do not understand, but when he said that and you're a fool, he little thought, said, "No, I'm smart", and begins to inflate the cheeks — well, if this were so, then all we would have lived a long time very well. Do not get me wrong — I'm as stupid as you are, but I know that, and you not, but it will know you and don't tell me that you don't know.
That's what we need to overcome and after that we expect great things, we must do a lot and this will be possible. It was then, and will need the knowledge and experience of each person to be submerged in an open logical information space design of the development, revised, amended and adopted in the space of knowledge civilization.
See also:
Twice a cancer survivor, the woman talks about what nobody wants to know
What seems like a rush or life complications...
Delta technology is a medicine, though bitter, but medicine and do not be offended, because when we create and implement a project that will be able to ensure the rapid development of the state. Delta technology offers the way out of the state of senselessness and the transition to the expanse of logical space creating a new civilization.published
Author: Boris Bulychev
P. S. And remember, only by changing their consumption — together we change the world! ©
Join us in Facebook , Vkontakte, Odnoklassniki
Source: viperson.ru/articles/boris-bulyuktov-analiz-chelovecheskoy-logiki
Australian manufacturer of buggies Tomcar launches a series of electric
Adriano Celentano and Claudia Mori: 50 years of love!