866
The parade of sovereignties
Denote the Donbas "parade of sovereignties", actively supported by the Russian special services, the possibility of canceling the internal social dialogue between pro-Ukrainian and pro-Russian part of Ukrainian society.
Touch on some fatal mistakes that were made by pro-Russian forces in Eastern Ukraine:
1) "Standing Up in a pose" - instead of admitting their mistakes and searching dialogue aimed at developing a new social contract, the elite in the east and south of Ukraine began to put the rest of Ukraine, the de facto ultimatum that the position of the East should "be taken with respect ". This caused a backlash, because of what was missed opportunity to realize the prospects of the creation of the new state, with a compromise of public dialogue, which is more suited to all Ukrainian society;
2) The radicalization process - processes assert their rights in the East of Ukraine moved very quickly from the norms of the peace process, to radical forms of expression. Separatists in this appeal to the events related to the Maidan, which is fundamentally correct, that's the whole point, that the Maidan two months passed in the form of shares of peaceful civil disobedience to more radical opposition Maidan moved only 19 January 2014 response to adopted amendments to the legislation toughening the repressive measures against civil protest (there might argue about the events of December 1, 2013 near the presidential administration on the street. Bankova, but there is one serious "but" the very force action, is considered a clear provocation was stopped by the participants of the Maidan, in including Poroshenko, and thereafter until January 19, 2014 at the Independence radical actions of military confrontation was not observed);
3) Explicit reliance on external intervention. The social base of Protestants in eastern Ukraine undoubtedly undoubtedly present, which confirms and sociology, but a clear interference in Russia under the guise of a cynical and blatant lies finally severed the potential to establish as vnutriobschestvenny Ukrainian dialogue and intersocietal Ukrainian-Russian dialogue.
We all are witnessing as Ukrainian society begins to reject any manifestation of Russian-ness in their environment, instead of good neighborly relations established the kingdom of mutual antagonism and manifestation russkost in Ukraine is becoming a truly undesirable, is the refusal of the Ukrainian society from the "Russian world", is generated primarily by the Russian society and its state machine. This was bound to be a logical continuation - "Goodbye Russia!", But not only in the moral and ethical, but also in the physical plane, there is a stable zone intersocietal confrontation with the absence of even a hint of the possibility of social diffusion. In this case there is no need to "iron curtain", it has occurred and the logic of events suggests that in the coming years suspension from each other will only expand.
Yes, now Ukraine is facing a number of important problems of life, for which Ukrainian society will be mobilized, and the self, and to develop strategy and tactics, but one thing is clear, the next few years for Ukraine closed "Russian question" as a matter of culture and geopolitics.
Your text to link ...
Touch on some fatal mistakes that were made by pro-Russian forces in Eastern Ukraine:
1) "Standing Up in a pose" - instead of admitting their mistakes and searching dialogue aimed at developing a new social contract, the elite in the east and south of Ukraine began to put the rest of Ukraine, the de facto ultimatum that the position of the East should "be taken with respect ". This caused a backlash, because of what was missed opportunity to realize the prospects of the creation of the new state, with a compromise of public dialogue, which is more suited to all Ukrainian society;
2) The radicalization process - processes assert their rights in the East of Ukraine moved very quickly from the norms of the peace process, to radical forms of expression. Separatists in this appeal to the events related to the Maidan, which is fundamentally correct, that's the whole point, that the Maidan two months passed in the form of shares of peaceful civil disobedience to more radical opposition Maidan moved only 19 January 2014 response to adopted amendments to the legislation toughening the repressive measures against civil protest (there might argue about the events of December 1, 2013 near the presidential administration on the street. Bankova, but there is one serious "but" the very force action, is considered a clear provocation was stopped by the participants of the Maidan, in including Poroshenko, and thereafter until January 19, 2014 at the Independence radical actions of military confrontation was not observed);
3) Explicit reliance on external intervention. The social base of Protestants in eastern Ukraine undoubtedly undoubtedly present, which confirms and sociology, but a clear interference in Russia under the guise of a cynical and blatant lies finally severed the potential to establish as vnutriobschestvenny Ukrainian dialogue and intersocietal Ukrainian-Russian dialogue.
We all are witnessing as Ukrainian society begins to reject any manifestation of Russian-ness in their environment, instead of good neighborly relations established the kingdom of mutual antagonism and manifestation russkost in Ukraine is becoming a truly undesirable, is the refusal of the Ukrainian society from the "Russian world", is generated primarily by the Russian society and its state machine. This was bound to be a logical continuation - "Goodbye Russia!", But not only in the moral and ethical, but also in the physical plane, there is a stable zone intersocietal confrontation with the absence of even a hint of the possibility of social diffusion. In this case there is no need to "iron curtain", it has occurred and the logic of events suggests that in the coming years suspension from each other will only expand.
Yes, now Ukraine is facing a number of important problems of life, for which Ukrainian society will be mobilized, and the self, and to develop strategy and tactics, but one thing is clear, the next few years for Ukraine closed "Russian question" as a matter of culture and geopolitics.
Your text to link ...
