Black dog syndrome and scientific myths

One of the most important scientific urokov



Black dog syndrome - it's pretty simple effect seen employees shelters pets. As a rule, volunteers are not too happy when it gets to the black puppy. They are even less happy if it gets to the adult black dog.

It is believed that black dogs do not like. No matter how good-natured animals - people see a black skin and do not take it. Those workers who have to spend months in a shelter, where there is a black dog, suffer - for them such a dog is always a source of potential suffering.





The syndrome has been studied. It was found that the dark color coat adversely affect the acceptance of the animal. Sometimes such dogs even denied shelter - study from 1988 found that the black dog is much less likely to find a new home than in dogs of any other color. The same goes for cats - black take much less regardless of gender and age of the animal.

Scientists decided to find out why, and without further ado, ask people what they think of black dogs. Study photographs showed that dogs with light skin people seem to be more good-natured and emotionally secure.

It is obvious that there is a problem: people are afraid of black dogs, especially large ones. But wait - is this true? Really it's only color?

Yes, the color is important. But first of all people give birth purebred dogs instead strays, regardless of color. Does size matter - no one will keep the dog in a studio apartment. It plays an important role and age. Only taking into account these factors, people are starting to choose the color of the dogs.

And then comes the amazing: black dogs have even more chances to find a home than the light. For example, black poodles people find beautiful white, and the same is true for almost any dog ​​breed. So black dog syndrome is fabricated, however, because it is considered to be existing, no one comes to mind to inspect. The same applies to many other areas of science: the myths arise constantly, but to the myth, bright enough to make a statement, but to refute it, it takes time and money on research and experiments. And even if these studies will be carried out - not the fact that with their help you will be able to convince firmly believe in the myth.





A striking example is the vaccination: there are only two, and quite questionable, studies that vaccination may be harmful, and dozens of papers that prove the opposite: the vaccine is harmless and absolutely necessary. Did these ten denials to win a myth about the dangers of vaccinations? No, of course.

If there is a study proving that ginger cures eczema, and ten others refute this allegation and debunks the myth that you think a reference to some of them hang on his website seller ginger? ..

Scientific myths die hard and are so common that we should always remember the black dog syndrome and take nothing for granted without checking and confirmation.

via factroom.ru

Tags

See also

New and interesting