“Don’t look at your passport, there’s nothing new.” What was Elena Malikova hiding?

On January 24, Dmitry and Elena Malikov became parents for the second time, using the services of a surrogate mother.

For a long time until the birth of a child, the star couple tried to hide the details of their plans for replenishment in the family. But someone from the medical staff of the clinic, the services of which were used by the Malikovs, leaked information to the television. The couple had to talk about the birth of the baby on Instagram.





It is known that for the birth of the second child, the family of Dmitry Malikov paid about 2 million rubles. Fans are generous with congratulations, but not without criticism against 55-year-old Elena Malikova. Internet users believe that After 50 years, it is too late to have children..





Elena Malikova claims that age is irrelevant.

I want to say thank you to everyone for the kind words and congratulations, and even thank you for the malicious comments - your poison and sting released in my address train my soul! I don’t want to argue with the rest of the world, but those who feel compelled to comment on our private lives need to hear my point of view.

There! You can treat life and age differently: you can be irritated by the young, beautiful, rich, afraid of old age and tomorrow, and think of death with horror. But there's another way. Just be happy every day.To love those who are nearby, to take care of them, not to sit still, but to act, not to sour, but to develop and, finally, not to look into your passport – there is nothing new and interesting there.

Yes, it is also necessary to forgive offenders, in my opinion, Instagram sent us for forgiveness. One last thing! Thanks to the birth of our son, there is more love on this earth! I wish you happiness!

Other critics were outraged by the fact that the star child was born with the help of surrogacy Reproductive technology, in which a woman carries and gives birth to a child for other parents.





Celebrity children They are increasingly using surrogate mothers. They have already been used by Alena Apina, Alla Pugacheva, Philip Kirkorov, George Lucas, Nicole Kidman, Robert de Niro, Sarah Jessica Parker, Ricky Martin, Cristiano Ronaldo, Elton John.





Opponents of this practice believe that surrogate mothers are not from a good life.





In the context of the problem of surrogacy, a woman appears as a living incubator. victim of gender inequality, exploited by representatives of the more wealthy class. Children born in this way are treated as a kind of living commodity.





Would a woman agree to rent out her body and put her reproductive system, mental health, at risk, if she were from the wealthy, prosperous and healthy circles of society? We're sure not.





If every woman in the world was paid fairly, everyone would have decent living conditions, a normal childhood, and a decent education – who would choose to become a surrogate or prostitute?





Do you believe that people have the right to satisfy their desires through exploitation?

A terrible example of an alternative future where women are used as slave donors to reproduce the offspring of a childless ruling elite is a novel. "The Handmaid's Tale" Margaret Atwood. Based on this dystopia, the series of the same name was shot.

5907



In the near future, a huge social problem arose - the sterility of the wives of officials and nobility, so ordinary women become slaves of high society, whose duty is to bear and give birth to a child for their "owners."

Can we expect such an outcome? Who knows... But every woman has the right to control her own body and understand the risks and consequences of the decisions taken without condemnation from society.





Advocates of surrogacy do not see him as an ethical problem, because this is a free choice of a woman, a type of voluntary cooperation involving the signing of a contract for material compensation. As well as obtaining moral satisfaction from the benefits of others.





Children were born to surrogate mothers in Roman times. We dare to assume that this type of service will not lose its relevance, despite the contradictory status in society. After all, psychologically, such a child will always be several times closer and closer than a child taken from an orphanage.

Do you think that childless couples should still have a chance to have a native child or should surrogacy be banned? Do you condemn families willing to do anything to have a child? Your opinion is very important to us, share it in the comments.