Oncology - a thriving business

The art of medicine is to impress the patient's treatment, is nature itself will not cure it.

Did you know that in the oncology industry employing more people than is being treated for cancer? The annual turnover of the industry of hundreds of billions of dollars. Now think about it: if there is, or rather will be recognized, at least one of the dozens of existing products or protocols that solve the problem of cancer, what will happen to cancer clinics, diagnostic centers, doctors, technical and administrative staff, as well as with manufacturers of expensive diagnostic equipment, which are involved in the industry?

Did you know that for a cancer patient, American insurance companies pay an average of $ 350, 000, and for the natural treatment they do not pay and the dollar? The course of treatment of foreign patients in the United States, Israel, Britain and other Western countries costs from $ 250, 000 to $ 1 million.!

The cost is included in the treatment drug or combination of drugs range from $ 3 000 to $ 20, 000 per month. Profit, which is produced by the pharmaceutical company from selling single chemotherapeutic agent, can reach 500, 000%!

This profit can not be justified by the high cost of research and obtain a patent, as the profit of these companies is increasing and amounts to tens of billions of dollars annually, and the main item of expenditure is the advertising of medicines produced by them, as well as lobbying for the interests of these companies.

For comparison, the Gerson protocol, which has 90% of success in the treatment of cancer, it is worth only a few hundred dollars a month, and only $ 25, 000 for a short course of treatment at a clinic in Tijuana, Mexico. Bill Henderson Protocol is only $ 5 a day, and the doctor Circus protocol - even cheaper. Some of the treatments carried out in the home, may only cost $ 50 per month.

It would be naive to assume that the official oncology, Big Pharma and policy bought it will sincerely try to cure the cancer. Organizations like "the American Cancer Association", the British equivalent of "Cancer Research UK" and similar large charities to fight cancer, receive billions of dollars in subsidies a year.

At the same time a dollar not spent on the study of natural and far more successful alternatives, while all funds (after paying huge salaries leadership of these organizations) are in the research of blind areas, such as chemotherapy.

Very often, the leaders of these "charitable" organizations are coming to the leading positions of the Big Pharma. Also, the heads of these funds after several years of work often get managerial positions in the same pharmaceutical companies. So naive to expect from these supposedly independent organizations that they will work towards ending its activities.

That's why one of the main activities of these organizations, as well as of the medical establishment is fighting much more successful alternative cancer treatments, as well as the population of misinformation about the real causes of cancer and its prevention.

They also controlled by Wikipedia, which is carried out with the help of the army proplachennyh shadow writers. They create websites such as Quackwatch, where all natural methods, their authors and experts who use them, are subject to rough pseudo-criticism and discredit.

Numerous Internet provocateurs army (the so-called "trolls") paid by the medical establishment and the likes of "charitable" organizations that are actively involved in discussions on the theme of oncology, vaccination, benefits or harm of a particular type of treatment or medication.

Those interested in these topics people are coming to these resources for information, but often remain confused Dixit these "virtual stylus workers." I often brought to communicate with them as English-speaking, and on the Russian sites. And I'm always amazed at the similarity mocking rough manners of communication of each of the "trolls" and obviously learned arguments and attacks.

Despite the fact that since the announcement by President Nixon's war on cancer in 1971, the United States spends on oncology more money than any other country, incidence rates are increasing steadily, cancer younger, and mortality rates are not decreasing for 40 years .

According to current projections, starting from now, in America will get sick with cancer every second man and every third woman throughout her life. Other developed countries are also close to such statistics. In Russia (currently already sick of every five or six) of cancer statistics is constantly growing, and if the state of affairs to address problems in this area will not change dramatically, Russia will soon overtake America in this unenviable indicator. During the years of the "war" against cancer loomed a solid trend: the more money is invested in oncology, the more cancer there is and the more patients - the more profit Big Pharma, more publicity, political influence, leading to even greater investment
One can cite many examples of more traditional oncology, where the interests of big business profits prevail over common sense and the interests of the people. To give just a couple of examples.

Mammography, which is recommended for women to do after 40 years, every year, by itself is carcinogenic. There are studies that prove that each mammography increases the risk of cancer by 1-2% annually. In addition, this method is quite expensive and quite inaccurate.

It is believed that the erroneous diagnosis is made up to 40% of cases. At the same time there is thermography which has diagnostic accuracy of 98%, is 4-5 times cheaper and is absolutely harmless procedure. However, honey. establishment does not introduce its wide application, and it can be found only in selected small centers and clinics.

Another example - a test gene breast cancer, which costs $ 3, 000. Despite the fact that the presence of gene mutation BRAC1 and BRAC2 absolutely insufficient for the onset of disease, and that the most important factor in the control of the gene is a food, and other external factors, this test, however, has become wider and wider used, and will probably soon be recommended for all women.

If honey. establishment was interested in the prevention of breast cancer, it is much easier and cheaper it would be to explain to women who have a bad heredity, that they just need to change lifestyle and nutrition, to reduce the level of stress, remove as many carcinogens out of your life, and regularly cleaned the body of toxins.

I am convinced that knowing this, much less women would go on crippling preventive double mastectomy (surgery to remove the breast), which tries to promote the official oncology as a method of prevention of breast cancer.

What do we offer more? Cut one lung, a kidney and thereby reduce the likelihood of cancer of organs twice? After the provocative statements of Angelina Jolie that it is for cancer prevention has removed himself both breasts, many women began to follow her example. In England, already there were cases when it followed the example of the men and removed himself prostate to prevent her cancer.

There are some scientific studies that the role of genes in cancer diseases did not exceed 5.2%, and the rest - the factors comprising these genes. This deals with the new science of epigenetics, which proves that our genes are regulated by environmental factors through our perception. The main role in this is played by the cell membrane is responsible for the fact what factors can change gene expression.

Is it not more reasonable to work to eliminate the factors of 95-98%, than do the road test for the gene mutation probability is statistically not as great as the effect of such a mutation can be corrected fairly simple lifestyle changes? On the other hand, a positive result of this test can bring a prophylactic double mastectomy (very expensive and mutilation)!

I hope that many readers in the several foregoing facts and arguments can find the answer to the question: "If, indeed, there are effective treatments for cancer, then why do they still do not apply? After all, if such methods or drugs existed, we would probably just learned about them from the media, and the doctors would immediately began to apply them?. »

To summarize the answer as follows: oncology - is the largest business, which is rigidly fighting for its monopoly by establishing full control over the methods of treatment and diagnosis of cancer, as well as with the help of bought politicians and infiltrated its employees of regulatory agencies. Mass media is an effective instrument for controlling information on this topic.

Another frequent question: "Where are the people who were cured by natural methods? Why them and by them can not hear anything?. »

On this question I want to answer with an example. Recently, I saw on the Internet circulation of the volunteers for help for the girl, a cancer patient in stage 4. She had to raise $ 400 000 (!!!) for treatment in Israel. Many wished her recovery and made a donation to the bank account.

But there were also at least 10-12 people in one to two days, wanting to help the girl, who gave examples of his healing from cancer. Most had cancer stage 4, and doctors have abandoned them. Someone cured hunger and Urinotherapy someone juices and diet, someone cleaning the body, vitamins and dietary supplements-s, some prayers.

All these methods are natural. Let some of them are very narrow (from the point of view of modern natural alternative cancer) and some pretty radical, but they have helped people! It would be logical to ask these volunteers to cure people on the details and bring them to the girl's family. But the opposite happened - the volunteers roughly forbade these people to beat cancer to leave their messages on the page, arguing that the girl needed money for treatment, not "stupid" advice.

This suggests that many of us simply do not want to see people who are self-heal, using similar means. Most expect to hear the story of the healing methods of the traditional, rather than the alternative of oncological treatment, since otherwise crumbling their faith in the official medicine.

And in fact, of the 10 patients beat cancer at stage 4, all 10 will be those who had been treated with natural methods. Only a small number of people can be found in 1-3-th degree of Cancer, which cured using traditional methods of oncology (surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy). And the words of the famous German scientist Johanna Budwig physiologist: "We do not know whether these people were cured through chemotherapy and radiotherapy, or in spite of it»

. Here I want to dwell on the oncological treatment in the West. I was a witness of how cancer patients brought the kids "heal" in the best hospitals of Europe. A lot of money allocated by the Russian government on the treatment of children through Rusfond, and the money collected by people in good amounts, sometimes as high as $ 500, 000 per child, "helped" a hospital where the children were brought.

In most cases, the patients received the same preparations and the same protocols radiotherapy. The difference was only that the treatment was continued until the end - that is, to the child's death from complications of treatment.

Perhaps many of you will be surprised, but I believe that the Russian oncologists with a professional and moral point of view, doing the right thing, when, after a certain number of cycles of chemotherapy, as well as the understanding that difficult treatment does not lead to a positive result, they let the patient's home.

Thus, intentionally or not, they give the patient a small but a chance that the body will recover and he will continue to fight with cancer, or having no other choice, the patient will look for other treatments that are more likely to lead to a cure or stop the disease .

Many Russians communicate with me, beat cancer with the help of folk or natural methods, were such "refuseniks". Working in expensive foreign hospitals oncologists will welcome such "refuseniks", if they are willing to shell out hundreds of thousands of dollars for treatment. There will be courteous and carefully handle them, bringing to the inevitable result. So the result will be death from complications of treatment, which in 99% of cases will be officially defined as "which came as a result of aggressive disease."

In the course of my research and work in the field of natural methods of cancer treatment I have been involved in many English-speaking blogs and seminars, and therefore constantly communicate with 3-4-th degree be cured of cancer in human beings and read or listen to their stories about how they were treated and how . According to my own statistics, 19 out of 20 of these people have been treated with natural methods (often following a nasty and traumatic conventional oncological treatment).

I have read many books the most famous authors who have brought hundreds of examples of curing people one way or another natural method. We also know that the clinic Harry Huxley in 30-50-ies Tens of thousands of people cured of his method. Canadian nurse Casey has cured thousands of people their isiak-tea. Max Gerson and his daughter Charlotte have cured thousands of patients from which the medicine has declined.

Brzhinskogo clinic in Texas for more than 20 years of experience in the treatment of advanced cases of cancer antineoplastonami (under US law only such cases and only after a full traditional oncological treatments may apply to his clinic) with much better results than the official oncology.

Dr. Barton in his clinic in the Bahamas has successfully treated many difficult cancers invention of immune serum. Many professionals today are successfully using these and other cancer treatments. Everything is documented and available for official organizations, or simply for people who are interested.

It is very rare to find the few that are recovered after the traditional methods, and as a rule, they defeated the disease is not because of, but in spite of chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery, a devastating effect on the body as a whole and in particular on the immune system. And most of all - they are people who have been wrongly diagnosed, for example, when mammography or errors in the treatment of asymptomatic, rarely ozlokachestvlyayuschihsya tumor type Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS), which practically never maligniziruyut

. Women with this diagnosis receive the entire arsenal of conventional oncology and if survive after him, then replenish positive statistics cured of cancer. Also, it may be people just stepped across the 5-year survival barrier is a cancer, which the official said cured, oncology, while secondary cancer, caused by conventional treatments often appear only after 5-10 years.
< br> The same fate exposed men after a very imprecise PSA test for prostate cancer. This cancer, even when diagnosed correctly, has very slow growth. If this growth is not accelerated the destruction of the immune system and other important systems of the body, the prostate cancer can be asymptomatic for decades.

Despite the inaccuracy of these surveys lead to false diagnoses or "heal" when it is not required (in cases of precancerous lesions, such as DCIS or slow-growing prostate tumors), the official oncology is not only not going to change their diagnostic methods, bringing it billions of dollars a year, but on the contrary - he is trying to reach more and more people these supposedly preventive examinations

. Over the past 10 years, more than 1 million (!) In the United States women have been wrongly diagnosed and treated for cancer. Apparently, this situation suits the medical establishment and big business, which it controls, because they earn the more, the more people are examined and receive a diagnosis of cancer.

An excerpt from the book by Boris Greenblatt "DIAGNOSIS - CANCER: Dermatologic or live?"


See also

New and interesting