469
It turns out, is not so simple with vaccination - revelatory Australian thesis
In Australia, defended thesis critically examines public vaccination programs and insist on their change.
Your attention is invited to make a small note in the Dutch news.
"The Australian graduate student, caused a stir in the medical world, wrote a thesis about the errors in the state program of vaccination and pharmaceutical industries.
Much to the dismay of the medical establishment, the university has approved the text of her thesis.
So Judy Wilyman, a prominent figure in the anti-vaccination movement, recently won the title of "Doctor of Philosophy" (Ph.D.).
Hypotheses are called "justified"
Proponents of vaccination programs for children responded as bitten by a viper, and offered to Wollongong University to reconsider its position on the statement of work. However, the university has not changed its position, since the hypothesis is considered in the thesis Villiman "very justified". This University is reviewing other thesis approved for defense, but not this one.
In his dissertation Judy Wilyman, the driving force of the organization, "Decisions about vaccination and vaccination choice", argues that international organizations such as the World Health Organization (WHO), are in the large-scale collusion with the pharmaceutical industry to promote vaccination.
She presented her thesis at the end of last year, concluded that the Australian policy of vaccination was not the result of an independent examination, and was formed as a result of pressure from the pharmaceutical industry for the WHO.
Various researchers in the field of medicine and public health officials have not recognized the results of this research work, protected as part of the Institute of "School of Humanities" mentioned university. Hence, there were demands to the Academic Council of the University re-examined the situation, put forward by the defense.
University until now refuses to meet any request for review.
Key provisions of the thesis
Unusual Wilyman scientific work includes the following provisions:
1. Objective supervision of contraindications or assess the effectiveness of vaccination for the population, which could provide important data on the impact of vaccination for the population, there is.
2. WHO has no relation to the international community and the control of the WHO is carried out based on the interests of large corporations and the World Bank.
3. There is no proven scientific evidence that those diseases for which vaccinations are recommended, pose a serious threat to the health of the majority of Australian children.
4. The advertising campaign for the wrong vaccine risks of HPV infection were given cervical cancer and cervical cancer in women in different countries. This was done deliberately in order to create a market for the vaccine against cervical cancer.
5. pandemic "swine flu" in 2009 was declared by WHO secret committee associated with the pharmaceutical corporations fighting for a huge profit from a pandemic.
In the barrage of criticism that hit Judy Wilyman and University of Wollongong currently striking that no critic has been unable to convincingly challenge the position put forward by Willyman.
Instead, critics are trying to discredit the reputation of Willyman, which is called "anti-vaccination crazy", and tarnish the reputation of the university.
Author: Svetlana Ilyina
Your attention is invited to make a small note in the Dutch news.
"The Australian graduate student, caused a stir in the medical world, wrote a thesis about the errors in the state program of vaccination and pharmaceutical industries.
Much to the dismay of the medical establishment, the university has approved the text of her thesis.
So Judy Wilyman, a prominent figure in the anti-vaccination movement, recently won the title of "Doctor of Philosophy" (Ph.D.).
Hypotheses are called "justified"
Proponents of vaccination programs for children responded as bitten by a viper, and offered to Wollongong University to reconsider its position on the statement of work. However, the university has not changed its position, since the hypothesis is considered in the thesis Villiman "very justified". This University is reviewing other thesis approved for defense, but not this one.
In his dissertation Judy Wilyman, the driving force of the organization, "Decisions about vaccination and vaccination choice", argues that international organizations such as the World Health Organization (WHO), are in the large-scale collusion with the pharmaceutical industry to promote vaccination.
She presented her thesis at the end of last year, concluded that the Australian policy of vaccination was not the result of an independent examination, and was formed as a result of pressure from the pharmaceutical industry for the WHO.
Various researchers in the field of medicine and public health officials have not recognized the results of this research work, protected as part of the Institute of "School of Humanities" mentioned university. Hence, there were demands to the Academic Council of the University re-examined the situation, put forward by the defense.
University until now refuses to meet any request for review.
Key provisions of the thesis
Unusual Wilyman scientific work includes the following provisions:
1. Objective supervision of contraindications or assess the effectiveness of vaccination for the population, which could provide important data on the impact of vaccination for the population, there is.
2. WHO has no relation to the international community and the control of the WHO is carried out based on the interests of large corporations and the World Bank.
3. There is no proven scientific evidence that those diseases for which vaccinations are recommended, pose a serious threat to the health of the majority of Australian children.
4. The advertising campaign for the wrong vaccine risks of HPV infection were given cervical cancer and cervical cancer in women in different countries. This was done deliberately in order to create a market for the vaccine against cervical cancer.
5. pandemic "swine flu" in 2009 was declared by WHO secret committee associated with the pharmaceutical corporations fighting for a huge profit from a pandemic.
In the barrage of criticism that hit Judy Wilyman and University of Wollongong currently striking that no critic has been unable to convincingly challenge the position put forward by Willyman.
Instead, critics are trying to discredit the reputation of Willyman, which is called "anti-vaccination crazy", and tarnish the reputation of the university.
Author: Svetlana Ilyina
