On the shortcomings of modern synthesizers and how to fight them

Background h4> I remind you that it is - my vision of history. Who's Afraid of misrepresentation, well, or just knows, can skip this topic. I>

It all started in the 60s of last century, when electronic music was cut and glued tape some enthusiasts who believed that she was - the future. They certainly have not lost, although the conditions for its entry, to put it mildly, then left much to be desired, and could afford such a pretty rich musicians and engineers. Why engineers? Because they created those "cosmic" sounds huge, shkafopodobnyh typewriters, whose name was sound synthesizer. They were monophonic instruments, but polyphony was not really need them - when you press a single key that they can play as many votes as he was rich musician - synthesizer could safely dokomplektovyvatsya new and new modules, which are below. Often there was no keyboard at all, or contained only a couple of octaves - it almost does not matter. To deal with the synthesis of sound and record electronic compositions, was not enough to just be a musician - with a heap of wires and a huge closet just wanted to take my guitar and pass by. So music was written by those who were far from it, which led to the fact that synthesizers associated with tons of wires ...



... And healthy wardrobes!



But in the '70s sounds nagremevshie known "modular", created by students under the floors of boring engineering university, began to cause downright ochumenny interest in almost all of the then bands and musicians. Huge, no, the biggest role in the development of the "electronics" played American company «Moog», named after the founder and produce up to that time the head tube. Robert Moog was just a superhero, devoting the rest of his life analog synthesizers. His company is still successfully exists, and its products are an ideal sound quality vintage analog synthesizers.

By the way, In Soviet Russia, too, did the analog synthesizers, which were known far beyond its borders. Here is a classic example of the legendary Polivoks.



Somewhere in the 80s appeared and began to develop digital synthesizers; their age continues to this day, as is easily seen. But people tend to get tired. Companies such as Casio or Yamaha suddenly lost customers (but not popularity), because people are tired of podnadoevshih presets, remembering warm and a versatile sound old swingers, rushed to his grandfather to the attic to ensure that their return. Feeble and almost zagnuvshiesya company still produces modular synthesizers, prosekli chip and began to wring price. And some of the newly created company, for example Waldorf, this chip not only prosekli but also made them useful conclusions, prepared a surprise for later. When it became clear that the modular pleasure not everyone can afford, and got presets, Waldorf bore Waldorf Q, synth new generation, a new method of wave tables and combines all the things that we do not have enough, fans of electronic music: small size, full control synthesis, and also was equipped with buns for subtractive change the sound.

Waldorf Q in the capable hands
Well, and then you know yourself - computers, plug-ins, less expensive radio ... now the equal right to exist have all kinds of synthesizers, they claimed, but still dominated by computers and digital synthesis, and even more - presets (yes, yes, so your dabchik sounds at times like this the same way - using the same modulation parameters, all related presets).

Yamashka vorksteyshn as an example of modern digital synthesizer

Well, the history of all of the small exception: large modular synthesizers back again. Details are cheaper, diagrams, stored before firms in the strictest confidence, appeared in the now-speed Internet access. So why not? .. Bach, where the soldering iron?

Actually, the project h4> Taking into account the history of these tools crazy capabilities of computers and cheap stones, the availability of old patterns and even having them step by step instructions and tutorials, we decided to create something monstricheskoe ... But first I will try list the advantages and disadvantages of the classical modular and modern digital synthesizers (hardware synthesizers will be considered in the sense of physically existing as tools).

Cons purely modular synthesizers:

Plans, plans, plans ... h4> Our main task - to build a modular synthesizer, all the parameters of which (excluding the connection modules) will be controlled by microcomputer can be crammed into memory for later use. It also opens up an opportunity for a substantial reduction in the dimensions of the tool, as most of his size is not printed circuit boards and circuits, and the front panel. It can beat this way: let's say we want to have three oscillators, respectively, will be three identical front panel. You can make a front panel which display the inputs / outputs of the oscillators, and three buttons. To change the frequency of the first oscillator, it is necessary to press the first button and turn the frequency knob to change the frequency of the second - to press the second button and turn the same pen, and so on. In this space saving is slightly less than three times. With this method all the resistors must be replaced for the front panel on the transducer, the state of which is read and memorize the central controller, and in accordance with the data to change the resistance of the resistor in the circuit. Also with the help of the controller can record sound and then use these pieces as presets, which will undoubtedly make a synthesizer 20% cooler. And yet ... Yes, that only can be done with this controller! To achieve its goal, whether we like it or not, will have to make more than one intermediate tool, because only by experience can be done at all anything (well, not from scratch, a pancake).

I would like to know how people will react to such an idea, here. Well, I hope the first post was a success, thanks to those who read to the end.

Source: habrahabr.ru/post/221831/