Really impressive 3D-movies no more than ordinary viewers Bashny.Net

If the film is good, then it does not need 3D, and if not - then it is not 3D pomozhet



According to the latest reports, those who refuse to pay more for tickets to 3D-film screenings, preferring the usual two-dimensional version is likely to do the right thing: according to statistics, the cinema visitors get from watching 2D-picture no less fun than from the same films in 3D .

The researchers interviewed 225 volunteers after watching the two-dimensional and three-dimensional versions of the film "Thor." While many less distracted during the show "Torah" in 3D, and most celebrated episodes of some incredible realism, achieved with the help of 3D-technology in general, creators of 3D-tricks did not affect the impression of watching a movie. Earlier, in the course of other experiments, it was found that critical to the enjoyment of the painting is a dive into the atmosphere of film works, but 3D-tricks this practically does not contribute.



As explained by one of the leaders of the study, Brendan Rooney, a psychologist at the Institute of Art, Design and Technology Dun Laoghaire in Dublin: «3D allows you to effectively capture the attention of the viewer, but if the film itself is not too good, no technology will not help him».

Based on the results of Rooney and his colleague on the experiment Alice Hennessy declared groundless increase of prices for 3D-sessions, but the researchers pointed out that in some cases, three-dimensional version can really be spectacular usual: for example, "Avatar," James Cameron's worth watching in 3D, and if, as is the case with "Thor" volumetric version was released after the usual, most likely, nothing new, you will not see.

via factroom.ru