WEB 3.0. From saytotsentrizma to yuzerotsentrizmu, from anarchy to pluralism Bashny.Net

The text contained in a synoptic form the ideas expressed by the author in the report « philosophy of evolution and the evolution of the Internet ».

The main disadvantages and problems of the modern Web:

The catastrophic network congestion repeatedly duplicate content in the absence of a reliable mechanism for the search of the original source.
dispersed and not bound by the content - the inability to make a comprehensive selection of topics and, moreover, the levels of analysis.
The dependence of the presentation of content from publishers (often random, pursuing their own, usually commercial, purposes).
The weak coupling of search results with ontology (the structure of interest) of the user.
low availability and poor classification of archival content network (in particular, social networks).
Low participation of professionals in the organization (systematization) content, even though they are engaged in the business every day doing just systematization of knowledge, but the result of their work is fixed only on the local computer.
The main reason littered and irrelevance network - this we inherited from the Web 1.0 saytovoe device in which the main person in the network is not the owner of the information and the owner of the place of its location. That is, the network was transferred ideology material media content, which was the main place (library, shop, fence) and object (book, newspaper, a piece of paper), and only then their contents. But because, unlike the real world, the space in the virtual world is not limited and is worth a penny, the number of sites offering information on orders exceeded the number of units of unique content. Web 2.0 is partially correct the situation: each user has their personal space - an account on a social network and freedom to a certain extent its configuration. But the problem with unique content only worsened: kopipasta technology has increased by orders of magnitude the degree of duplication of information.
Efforts to overcome these problems of the modern Internet concentrated in two, to some extent interrelated directions.
1. Increase search accuracy by mikroformatirovaniya distributed over the sites content.
2. Create a "storage" reliable content. The first, of course, allows you to get more relevant search for compared to option specifies the keywords, but do not eliminate the problem of duplicate content, and most importantly, does not eliminate the possibility of fraud - systematization of information often makes its owner, not the author, much less than the consumer who is more interested in the relevance of the search.
  Developments in the second direction (Google, Freebase.Com , CYC et al.) make it possible to obtain reliable information clearly, but only in areas where it is possible - remains an open problem of pluralism of knowledge in the areas where there are no uniform standards and general logic of systematic data. It is difficult to solve the problem of obtaining, organizing and inclusion in the new (current) content, which is a major problem in today's socially oriented network.
  
  What are the solutions offers yuzerotsentristsky active approach outlined in the report « philosophy of evolution and the evolution of the Internet »
  1. Disclaimer saytovoy structure - the main element of the network should be a piece of content, rather than its location; network node must be user-configured with respect to a plurality of pieces of content that can be called by the ontology.
  2. The logical relativism (pluralism) stating the impossibility of the existence of a single logic of organizing information, recognizes the need for non-end-of virtually independent ontological clusters even within the same subjects. Each cluster is an ontology of a user (individual or generalized).
  3. An active approach to the construction of ontologies implies that ontology (cluster structure) is formed and manifested in the activities of the generator content. This approach necessarily requires reorienting services network content generation, the generation of ontologies that essentially means the creation of tools for the implementation of the network of any activity. Last will attract a lot of professionals in the network, which will provide its functioning. The last point can be written more:
    1. The ontology was created by professionals in the course of his professional activities. The system provides all the professional tools for administering, managing, and processing of any data type.
    2. The ontology is detected in the activities of a professional. Now it has become possible because a large percentage of the operations of any activity performed or recorded on a computer. Practitioners shall not build the ontology, it must act in a software environment, which is also the main instrument of its operations and ontologies generator.
    3. The ontology has become the main result of the activities (and for the system and for a professional) - the product of professional work ( text, presentations, spreadsheets) is just an excuse to build an ontology of this activity. Ontology is not tied to a product (the text), and the text is understood as an object generated in a specific ontology.
    4. Ontology ontology should be understood as a specific activity; many activities - many ontologies.
      So, the main conclusion: Web 3.0 is the transition from the web to the semantic saytotsentristskogo yuzerotsentristskoy network - a network of web pages with freely configurable content to the network of unique objects, united in the number of non-end cluster ontologies. On the technical side of Web 3.0 is a set of online services that provide a full range of tools making, editing, searching and display any content type, which simultaneously provide ontologization user activities, and through it ontologization content.
      
      Alexander Boldachev, 2012-2015
      
      Source: habrahabr.ru/post/256083/