500
Snipers Revolutionaries
Alternating revolution unfolding in North Africa, united by one piece. In all three countries, two of which had already lost its power stations were marked by actions of snipers, who shot the people involved in the protests. Snipers have become a trademark of many popular uprisings last twenty years. So in October 1993, the streets of Moscow heard the shots, and many of the witnesses of the events reported snipers operating in the capital, which according to some sources it was up to a hundred. Even after several years of investigation team Prosecutor's Office, which investigated the events, the facts established action in the streets of snipers, but their affiliation remained for her a question.
Those who closely followed the news on TV and read news feeds on Web sites, these cases are easy to catch the eye. So during the revolutionary events in Kyrgyzstan that took place in April last year, the crowd also shot by snipers. April 7 by the Government House on the central square of Bishkek on demonstrators for a few hours were being fired, which killed at least 91 people. Later in the summer the authorities announced the arrest of about 20 snipers involved in the events. According to some of them had at least seven representatives of foreign states.
via
Snipers blow Arab world
Now shooters with sniper rifles found alternately in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya and then in Yemen. Information from Tunisia on the subject received relatively little, mostly for the reason that a revolution in this country is over relatively quickly. However, eyewitness reports, there are mentions of the arrows leading into the crowd from the roofs of high-rise buildings.
After the completion of the revolution in Tunisia snipers gradually migrated to Egypt and here they have come under the scope of the foreign press. Since the Qatari channel "Al Jazeera" and the agency "ITAR-TASS" reported that on January 30 while trying to storm the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Egypt, the crowd had to open sniper fire. It was reported that the fire was the building of the Interior Ministry, killing more than 10 protesters.
I repeat the scenario with snipers and in Libya. Here the use of snipers, as everywhere else before that seems completely unnecessary measure that would only further destabilize the situation. So the world's news agencies spread information that on Saturday night February 19th at the Benghazi military snipers shot people who went to the funeral of the victims before the demonstrators. The victims of this incident began, at least 15 people, several dozen people were injured. Would the authorities purposefully underlay for themselves such a bomb, causing people to resistance to the regime? In Libya, in fact, "totalitarian" country of all undesirables could just "close" in prison, and did not give the order to shoot the crowd going to the funeral. As a result, he became a stronghold of Benghazi, the opposition and still is the main center of the rebels, while Libya has bombed planes of the international coalition. Is it the goal to pursue the Libyan military, shooting at demonstrators.
Destabilize the situation in Libya, there are snipers in Yemen. Already 9 of news feeds of news full of reports that the Yemeni police and army shot dead a protest march, reported at least 50 killed. According to doctors, the fire on the crowd, most likely led by snipers, as the majority of victims are marked with bullet wounds to the head and other vital centers of the body. March 14 "police" of the State re-opens fire on the protesters, are now at their campground, according to witnesses, the fire was from the roofs of nearby houses. March 19 opposition demonstration came under fire from unknown in the capital. The fire was opened on them after prayers, killing 39 people, and about 200 were injured. The fire was fought by the people from the roofs of houses located around the central square of Sana'a. After that Yemeni President declared a state of emergency and announced that by this action were not involved in any secret service or the army of Yemen. Once again, the use of snipers were frankly pointless, cruel and does not play into the hands of the ruling regime.
How can I stop the crowd
How can I stop the crowd of demonstrators, if the use of tear gas, rubber bullets and water cannons does not help? In such a situation, the army and police is the last possible option - the use of firearms. Originally used by the fire on top of the crowd, in order for people to understand that they were not joking, and then will have to shoot to kill. That's what stopped raging crowd if they want to do it with minimal losses among the demonstrators or to do without them. However, those who send people to the area, or the storming of government buildings, always necessary corpses need hatred and need the ability to throw it.
To the crowd stopped and dispersed, it should be understood that in her shoot, that people who are opposed to them at the moment, opened fire and ran out of jokes. The sooner the crowd recognizes this, the smaller the number of victims to disperse demonstrators. No crowd there will be a fire or machine guns, it just dissipates.
But with regard to the use of snipers, the crowd just did not notice them, did not hear these shots. You never know who fell next, could this person just stumbled on the obstacle. Sniper fire is impossible to disperse the crowd, and no one ever uses because of snipers because of the fact that their fire will remain invisible to the crowd. There is not a war, when one accurate shot that hit the commander is able to disorganize the unit. In the crowd is simply impossible to find this leader, it is uncontrollable. She does not think his head, she lives instincts.
But then a body with gunshot wounds to the head or the heart is required to find the journalists, and all this goes on TV and the Internet. Who is right in the turmoil of events rush to conduct ballistic examination, look for places from which snipers worked - no one. The answer is ready in advance and all the buds just fall on the head of the ruling regime. This is what the organizers are making such provocations.
Thus, the application of any interested party sniping was actually the hallmark of unrest in many countries. The most logical version seems the use of snipers by the opposition, who are trying to give the shooters for the representatives of the army and intelligence services of another "bloody regime". Also, this may have an interest and special services of foreign states who knowingly used such methods to sharpen the conflict. In most cases, they are interested in the victory of the opposition, but also a variant with a simple destabilization of the situation in the country often seems acceptable to them.
Source:
Those who closely followed the news on TV and read news feeds on Web sites, these cases are easy to catch the eye. So during the revolutionary events in Kyrgyzstan that took place in April last year, the crowd also shot by snipers. April 7 by the Government House on the central square of Bishkek on demonstrators for a few hours were being fired, which killed at least 91 people. Later in the summer the authorities announced the arrest of about 20 snipers involved in the events. According to some of them had at least seven representatives of foreign states.
via
Snipers blow Arab world
Now shooters with sniper rifles found alternately in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya and then in Yemen. Information from Tunisia on the subject received relatively little, mostly for the reason that a revolution in this country is over relatively quickly. However, eyewitness reports, there are mentions of the arrows leading into the crowd from the roofs of high-rise buildings.
After the completion of the revolution in Tunisia snipers gradually migrated to Egypt and here they have come under the scope of the foreign press. Since the Qatari channel "Al Jazeera" and the agency "ITAR-TASS" reported that on January 30 while trying to storm the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Egypt, the crowd had to open sniper fire. It was reported that the fire was the building of the Interior Ministry, killing more than 10 protesters.
I repeat the scenario with snipers and in Libya. Here the use of snipers, as everywhere else before that seems completely unnecessary measure that would only further destabilize the situation. So the world's news agencies spread information that on Saturday night February 19th at the Benghazi military snipers shot people who went to the funeral of the victims before the demonstrators. The victims of this incident began, at least 15 people, several dozen people were injured. Would the authorities purposefully underlay for themselves such a bomb, causing people to resistance to the regime? In Libya, in fact, "totalitarian" country of all undesirables could just "close" in prison, and did not give the order to shoot the crowd going to the funeral. As a result, he became a stronghold of Benghazi, the opposition and still is the main center of the rebels, while Libya has bombed planes of the international coalition. Is it the goal to pursue the Libyan military, shooting at demonstrators.
Destabilize the situation in Libya, there are snipers in Yemen. Already 9 of news feeds of news full of reports that the Yemeni police and army shot dead a protest march, reported at least 50 killed. According to doctors, the fire on the crowd, most likely led by snipers, as the majority of victims are marked with bullet wounds to the head and other vital centers of the body. March 14 "police" of the State re-opens fire on the protesters, are now at their campground, according to witnesses, the fire was from the roofs of nearby houses. March 19 opposition demonstration came under fire from unknown in the capital. The fire was opened on them after prayers, killing 39 people, and about 200 were injured. The fire was fought by the people from the roofs of houses located around the central square of Sana'a. After that Yemeni President declared a state of emergency and announced that by this action were not involved in any secret service or the army of Yemen. Once again, the use of snipers were frankly pointless, cruel and does not play into the hands of the ruling regime.
How can I stop the crowd
How can I stop the crowd of demonstrators, if the use of tear gas, rubber bullets and water cannons does not help? In such a situation, the army and police is the last possible option - the use of firearms. Originally used by the fire on top of the crowd, in order for people to understand that they were not joking, and then will have to shoot to kill. That's what stopped raging crowd if they want to do it with minimal losses among the demonstrators or to do without them. However, those who send people to the area, or the storming of government buildings, always necessary corpses need hatred and need the ability to throw it.
To the crowd stopped and dispersed, it should be understood that in her shoot, that people who are opposed to them at the moment, opened fire and ran out of jokes. The sooner the crowd recognizes this, the smaller the number of victims to disperse demonstrators. No crowd there will be a fire or machine guns, it just dissipates.
But with regard to the use of snipers, the crowd just did not notice them, did not hear these shots. You never know who fell next, could this person just stumbled on the obstacle. Sniper fire is impossible to disperse the crowd, and no one ever uses because of snipers because of the fact that their fire will remain invisible to the crowd. There is not a war, when one accurate shot that hit the commander is able to disorganize the unit. In the crowd is simply impossible to find this leader, it is uncontrollable. She does not think his head, she lives instincts.
But then a body with gunshot wounds to the head or the heart is required to find the journalists, and all this goes on TV and the Internet. Who is right in the turmoil of events rush to conduct ballistic examination, look for places from which snipers worked - no one. The answer is ready in advance and all the buds just fall on the head of the ruling regime. This is what the organizers are making such provocations.
Thus, the application of any interested party sniping was actually the hallmark of unrest in many countries. The most logical version seems the use of snipers by the opposition, who are trying to give the shooters for the representatives of the army and intelligence services of another "bloody regime". Also, this may have an interest and special services of foreign states who knowingly used such methods to sharpen the conflict. In most cases, they are interested in the victory of the opposition, but also a variant with a simple destabilization of the situation in the country often seems acceptable to them.
Source:
