Recently, the husband’s father passed away without leaving a will, and the husband now does not want to receive his share of the inheritance.

Inheritance issues are always difficult and unpleasant. Someone always has some grievances and grievances. The husband of the heroine of our story decided not to get involved in all this to avoid conflicts. However, she disagreed with his decision.



Editorial "Site" He tells you their situation and asks you to resolve their dispute.

My husband and I have been together for almost 20 years. All this time we live peacefully, without conflicts. He's a golden man, I still have to look for him. But sometimes his stubbornness drives me crazy. Especially when it comes to his own good. I think he's making a big mistake because of his stubbornness. But that's not the place to start.

My husband was raised only by his mother. His father left the family when Igor was a year old. Alimony paid properly, but did not seek to communicate. In his new marriage, he quickly had two children. He seems to have forgotten his first son.



Igor has wanted to communicate with his father all his life. I called him, took the initiative. But he responded with coldness, and in principle he was never interested in the life of his son. Even at our wedding, I was reluctant. He spent an hour at the party and left.



My husband died three months ago. He left quickly and suddenly. It came as a shock to everyone. Especially for Igor, even though he never got the proper love from his father. But he loved him very much. The news made him sick. He's just starting to wake up a little bit.



His father’s inheritance did not leave any will. It all happened very suddenly. However, during his life he managed to acquire some fortune. He has a three-bedroom apartment, a house in the village and one in a new building. I don’t know if each of my children has an apartment. I'm not trying to count his money, but there's my husband's share of it.

I talked to him about it the other day. After all, he also has the right to claim at least some part of the inheritance. I thought he understood that. But he doesn't want to hear about it. Says he's not gonna get into the inheritance section. They made it with their second wife. Let's say they're all left.



But I disagree. I think he's making a mistake. I understand that there is nothing significant to count on, but at least some money he could get. They would be very useful to us now. Our children are still in school, paying a mortgage for several more years. My mother-in-law is a little sick and needs help. In general, it would not hurt extra finance.

But my husband is against it. He doesn't listen to my arguments. Says he doesn't want conflict. It doesn’t matter if we’ve never spoken to these people. Can you not stand up for yourself and get what belongs to you? Am I right?



The words of the heroine of our history undoubtedly have logic. Her husband is entitled to a portion of her father’s inheritance. However, we can understand the heroine’s husband. It is unlikely that he much wants to communicate with those people, and especially to solve the issues of inheritance. Who do you think is right about this story?