I had to swallow the offense, because my mother-in-law gave a piece of land to my sister-in-law.

“My mother-in-law borrowed money from my husband to privatize the land. Mom’s request for Seryozha is the law, so he immediately agreed to help. My mother gave me money every month from her pension. And when she paid the debt, she gave the land to Seryozhina’s sister, who began to build a house there, Nina said. Nina resents her mother-in-law for the fact that she only helps her daughter, and borrows money from her son. Is it possible to take care of only one child? Isn't his son worthy of his mother's help?



My mother’s request: Seryozha and I are making good money, so when my mother came to borrow money, we were ready to help her. At that time, the amount asked by her mother-in-law was equal to her husband’s monthly salary. Seryozha's mother is good, decent, we had no doubt that she would repay the debt.



Galina Nikolaevna issued the documents and slowly gave us the amount in parts. The last time she came to pay her debt, she thanked us very much, baked a cupcake, told us what good children we were. Galina Nikolaevna said that if we suddenly need her help, she will never refuse us.



Later we found out that Seryozha's mother rewrote the land plot for her younger daughter. I can't imagine how she could do that. Galina Nikolaevna has two children, is that fair? In fact, she owes us nothing and helped her daughter at her own expense. Yes, she has every right to manage her money as she wants. But we helped her out.



We didn't talk to her for a long time after that. And recently my mother-in-law called and invited her to her birthday as if nothing had happened. I don't know what to do. I don't want to go, but she's a relative. A son cannot go to the feast of his mother.



I'm probably more offended than my husband. Forgive Galina Nikolaevna does not work, maybe she wants to improve relations at the holiday, but I will not go there. Why did she decide to help only one child? That is unfair.”



It is obvious that Nina and her husband have no financial problems. It is not known in what life situation Sergei's sister was. We don't know if she's alone or able to take care of herself. Perhaps the mother decided to help only her daughter, because she was confident in the viability of her son. Perhaps the daughter and son had a difficult relationship, so the mother had to borrow money to avoid conflict. But it came about because, anyway, the mother took care of only one child. What do you think about that?