785
Where goest thou, Ukraine?
Thinking about where to go Ukrainian.
This article is boring, though, and there are no figures (not to do it even more boring). So that the reader, or just be patient, Set it read. But it's saying, but a fairy tale to come. In Ukraine, there are many events, and they occur because life as before no one wants. And what wish the Ukrainians? Most are willing to improve the standard of living (lower) and the absence of corruption (conventionally middle-class). Someone wants freedom, so this factor will affect the analysis.
But the question is, how Ukrainians want to live and what their wishes come? Therefore, I offer you three of the most implemented way for Ukraine.
Conventionally, a European (or American, does not change the meaning, but in the future I will mention only the Europeans) way. For a long time he studied the media for ways to fight corruption in the EU post-Soviet countries. The recipe for the fight against corruption there is quite simple: it is necessary to destroy the resource base of corruption, and if easier, the entire production. Many ways to do this: eliminate tariffs, unequal conditions of competition (foreigners take out loans in their banks at low interest rates, are judged in their vessels with the Ukrainians, etc.), dumping prices, etc. It is a typical practice for the EU in the fight against corruption, but at the same time with the economy. However, the growth of living in such an approach is difficult to expect (as a whole and not for certain categories of citizens), it is practically impossible in the short term. 20 years from now it may be, but with the Ukrainian "stability" and throwing from side to side, probably waiting for shocks Ukraine did not give a result, even in the long term. As the struggle against dissent in the EU is quite serious, far from democracy, but it is allowed any opinion, unless it is contrary to the basic values. Well, to be easier, the Ukrainians can say and do whatever they want (yes even rabid Nazism), but in any case not to abandon the economic expansion.
Conventionally, the Russian (you can call it the Chinese, with some big assumption) way. Fighting corruption here is based on the fact that corrupt officials would leave their children, etc. live in this country. This is done by introducing relevant legislation. Briefly: you can do in Russia all you want, but you will taste all the delights of the consequences of their actions, one way or another. Very briefly: patriotism. The slow and evolutionary path, gives a smooth increase in living standards since its introduction, and in the long term better than "European choice". As can be noted minus active opposition, and often successful, representatives of other choice, since defects remain, although qualitatively changed. Attitude to freedom of speech the most loyal, the most opposition to the attempts of economic expansion and the preparations for it in the same way a violation of universal human values (in this case, however, the person is not very much appreciated, as opposed to the motherland).
Conventionally, Belarus (dictatorial) way. Just do not have to think that the dictatorship is always evil, too much depends on what kind of personality of the dictator. If the Ukrainians came to really worthy candidate for the role of the dictator, they would have no time to use it. But alas, there is no such candidates (although they may appear). This path is most effective in the short term but in the long unpredictable (because after the death of a good dictator is better not to come, that it is necessary to change the system with all its consequences). The attitude to freedom of speech is different, depending on the circumstances, but in general, aimed at protecting the dictatorial regime (do not forget that the dictatorship is not always evil).
Maybe someone thinks that people in power can change in the blink of an eye, you just change the tip? What is another option when sadim good people on top of the power and they begin to change all rotten? My answer is that this will lead to a tyranny, or the system will fight these "upstarts". Therefore, any attempt to stay within the existing Ukrainian democracy is doomed to failure. On the other hand, and attempt to resolve the issue by force is also not the best option: the transition to the dictatorship with great probability, not counting the casualties and destruction on the way. So, it remains semi-powershift confrontation, where the main factor is the wearing down of the enemy on the information and the physical level, almost like happening on the Maidan. Another thing is that the Ukrainians themselves must choose where to go and not be cattle that are slaughtered.
And the most interesting thing to choose any of the tracks, Ukraine does not have anywhere to join! Do not violate the Constitution of Ukraine, which indicated non-aligned status of Ukraine as an independent state. The union can be favorable, if the situation requires it. And while all these "associations" beneficial only to those who just sell the homeland, taking advantage of the available power.
Source:
This article is boring, though, and there are no figures (not to do it even more boring). So that the reader, or just be patient, Set it read. But it's saying, but a fairy tale to come. In Ukraine, there are many events, and they occur because life as before no one wants. And what wish the Ukrainians? Most are willing to improve the standard of living (lower) and the absence of corruption (conventionally middle-class). Someone wants freedom, so this factor will affect the analysis.
But the question is, how Ukrainians want to live and what their wishes come? Therefore, I offer you three of the most implemented way for Ukraine.
Conventionally, a European (or American, does not change the meaning, but in the future I will mention only the Europeans) way. For a long time he studied the media for ways to fight corruption in the EU post-Soviet countries. The recipe for the fight against corruption there is quite simple: it is necessary to destroy the resource base of corruption, and if easier, the entire production. Many ways to do this: eliminate tariffs, unequal conditions of competition (foreigners take out loans in their banks at low interest rates, are judged in their vessels with the Ukrainians, etc.), dumping prices, etc. It is a typical practice for the EU in the fight against corruption, but at the same time with the economy. However, the growth of living in such an approach is difficult to expect (as a whole and not for certain categories of citizens), it is practically impossible in the short term. 20 years from now it may be, but with the Ukrainian "stability" and throwing from side to side, probably waiting for shocks Ukraine did not give a result, even in the long term. As the struggle against dissent in the EU is quite serious, far from democracy, but it is allowed any opinion, unless it is contrary to the basic values. Well, to be easier, the Ukrainians can say and do whatever they want (yes even rabid Nazism), but in any case not to abandon the economic expansion.
Conventionally, the Russian (you can call it the Chinese, with some big assumption) way. Fighting corruption here is based on the fact that corrupt officials would leave their children, etc. live in this country. This is done by introducing relevant legislation. Briefly: you can do in Russia all you want, but you will taste all the delights of the consequences of their actions, one way or another. Very briefly: patriotism. The slow and evolutionary path, gives a smooth increase in living standards since its introduction, and in the long term better than "European choice". As can be noted minus active opposition, and often successful, representatives of other choice, since defects remain, although qualitatively changed. Attitude to freedom of speech the most loyal, the most opposition to the attempts of economic expansion and the preparations for it in the same way a violation of universal human values (in this case, however, the person is not very much appreciated, as opposed to the motherland).
Conventionally, Belarus (dictatorial) way. Just do not have to think that the dictatorship is always evil, too much depends on what kind of personality of the dictator. If the Ukrainians came to really worthy candidate for the role of the dictator, they would have no time to use it. But alas, there is no such candidates (although they may appear). This path is most effective in the short term but in the long unpredictable (because after the death of a good dictator is better not to come, that it is necessary to change the system with all its consequences). The attitude to freedom of speech is different, depending on the circumstances, but in general, aimed at protecting the dictatorial regime (do not forget that the dictatorship is not always evil).
Maybe someone thinks that people in power can change in the blink of an eye, you just change the tip? What is another option when sadim good people on top of the power and they begin to change all rotten? My answer is that this will lead to a tyranny, or the system will fight these "upstarts". Therefore, any attempt to stay within the existing Ukrainian democracy is doomed to failure. On the other hand, and attempt to resolve the issue by force is also not the best option: the transition to the dictatorship with great probability, not counting the casualties and destruction on the way. So, it remains semi-powershift confrontation, where the main factor is the wearing down of the enemy on the information and the physical level, almost like happening on the Maidan. Another thing is that the Ukrainians themselves must choose where to go and not be cattle that are slaughtered.
And the most interesting thing to choose any of the tracks, Ukraine does not have anywhere to join! Do not violate the Constitution of Ukraine, which indicated non-aligned status of Ukraine as an independent state. The union can be favorable, if the situation requires it. And while all these "associations" beneficial only to those who just sell the homeland, taking advantage of the available power.
Source:
