Why is it better to photograph a child with a flash?

It is normal for parents to surround the child with attention and care. They give all the best that they have, and at the same time try to protect the child from any danger. Mom and Dad believe that it is better to be safe than to put your child at unnecessary risk. And even such an ordinary thing as flashshotIt makes parents anxious. Would the outbreak hurt the baby?

And today we decided to discuss this issue, referring to the advice of a pediatric ophthalmologist. After all, who is not a professional in his field knows the answer to such an important question.



Perhaps there are no more anxious women than young mothers who are afraid of everything in the world. Their desire to protect the baby often borders on obsession. Therefore, any horror story on such fertile soil takes root instantly.



In reality, the flash of a camera or smartphone does not pose a threat to the eyes of even a newborn child. For these fractions of a second, it cannot harm, and the intensity of its light is comparable to the average illumination of an open space on an overcast day.



Still, it is worth warning that under some conditions, a flash can harm even the eyes of an adult, and therefore it can not be used thoughtlessly. And if professional photographer If you do not photograph with a maximum flash from a distance of, say, 30 cm, then you cannot be sure that someone less professional will not dare to do such a stupid thing.

Note that a retinal burn is possible if a person is photographed with a flash, who before that spent half an hour in complete darkness (which means that the pupil of his eye is as open as possible and susceptible to light). With reasonable use of the camera, harm is impossible.



The opinion of a pediatric ophthalmologist "It is often asked about the dangers of an outbreak for children, and especially for newborns." And many answers, even doctors, confirm this harm. Questions and answers like that just make me nervous. Surely. photograph Just what you need with a flash, says categorically pediatric ophthalmologist Vadim Bondar.

“The safety of the outbreak has been proven, but it is not just that. It's good for a flash. Therefore, we should use this feature of our smartphones and cameras.”



“The fact is that normally, when we flash a photograph of a child, it bounces off the fundus of the eye. This is called the red eye effect. This is the only mechanism that allows parents and then doctors to diagnose the beginning of eye diseases.

“When something is placed on the bottom of the eye, it creates another glow, more often yellow or green. This is a suspicion of a tumor, which can lead to even the most serious consequences, the doctor warns.

“It is thanks to the red eye effect of flash photography that vision problems are diagnosed early, on time.” This saves 99% of the children. Most of them do not even have vision problems.”



The ophthalmologist cites the example of the UK, where posters are even made with an appeal to photograph children with a flash. They also explain why you should see a doctor if you find a yellow or green glow in the photo.

Therefore, Vadim Bondar himself advises not to listen to stupid prohibitions from unknowing people and boldly take pictures of their children. After all, the outbreak will not only not harm, but even help to identify serious problems in time.