349
The reactor of cold nuclear fusion in a glass of water
Why still we are using traditional energy sources, when for many years known alternative sources of relatively cheap energy?
The reason for this mass, such as: economic, technical and even political.
But let's start from the beginning.
Millions of years the planet Earth with various living organisms recycled carbon dioxide into coal, oil and natural gas. To turn all these natural resources back to carbon dioxide was relatively easy, just had to learn to use fire. Actually, this humanity and this has been so far.
With the development of science and technology, there were power converters, allowing the use of the energy of water, sun, wind, geothermal sources and even the energy of sea waves. But these converters have several disadvantages, chief of which is dependence on the forces of nature.
Mankind's attempts to harness the energy of fissile atomic nucleus from time to time was a success, but it was not less harmful to the environment than conventional thermal power plant.
What awaits us in the future?
In the distant future, we expect new technologies for producing energy through reactors, so-called, cold fusion. And in the near future, we plan not expect anything good.
The first and the main obstacle to this economic interest. Large capital conducts business in accordance with its strategic plans, in which there is no room for new technologies. It is foolish to withdraw money from the business when revenues are growing all the time, by leaps and bounds.
So, while the cost of oil and gas does not collapse so that mining will become unprofitable, one should not expect breakthrough in the field of new energy technologies. But prices are unlikely to collapse, as resources are depleted all the time, and this is the opposite of pushing up prices.
Why scientists don't do research in this direction?
Scientists doing research in that direction, for which funds are allocated.
For example, millions of dollars are spent every year on developing new drugs for cancer treatment. But, the funds allocate large pharmaceutical companies who need to sell drugs for cancer patients, not to cure patients, thereby destroying your well-oiled business.
The same thing happened with generators running on alternative fuels. In fact, research in the field of thermonuclear fusion (tokamak, Laser fusion) allocated huge sums for which it is fed by thousands of scientists. For half a century, we are experimenting, and who and now there. Whether scientists do not fundamentally want to change the doctrine, or patiently wait until the oil runs...
So here are some very useful for the companies technology can be harmful not only to big capital, but for the entire global economic system. After all for anybody not a secret that the economies of some countries are entirely dependent on hydrocarbon production.
So, only a revolution in energy, which will take place in the distant future, can radically change this cycle.
Enthusiasts why not build a compact power plant based on cold nuclear fusion?
Most of the known reactors has exist only in the form of a small laboratory installations, which are often not sufficiently detailed. In addition, the materials and the reagents used for the construction of such reactors is difficult to get someone without access to scientific laboratories. For example, You want to get a bottle of heavy water, and you will begin to suspect uranium enrichment.
But if you really want, you can now try at least to experiment with table reactors like reactors Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons or Andrea Rossi.
The background
The history of this experiment stems from a chance meeting at the resort. Then I took regular batteries, and my wife went to the store. There, he saw the shelf life AA Energizer items (approximately ten years), I tried to joke, remembering how Hodja Nasreddin promised to the Emir for 10 years to teach the donkey to talk.
He Haj Nasreddin commented on this: "In ten years, or the donkey dies, or the Emir..." standing Next to the buyer reacted to the joke. As it turned out, they were engineer with Russian roots. Word for word, and we have already discussed the problems of world energy. The conversation continues over a glass of tea. In the discussion, a new acquaintance told me an interesting story. The essence of the story is that, in the past, my counterpart worked in the laboratory for the development of desalination plants for Australia. The installation of these work on the basis of reverse osmosis filters. So, in one experiment, they received an anomalous heat production, with concomitant destruction of the membrane. Then I did not attach much importance, but then this idea came back to mind and began to haunt me. As a result, I had a ball – was engaged in experimental physics.
The reactor of cold nuclear fusion in a glass of water
After a series of experiments was built a very efficient reactor based on nanomembranes and resonator, original design.
The video shows the operation of the reactor, has with the release of abnormally high amounts of heat. Subscribe to our youtube channel www.youtube.com/channel/UCXd71u0w04qcwk32c8kY2BA/videos
To convince skeptics of the authenticity of the experiment, were taken some measures. In particular, the plant was collected on a glass stand. For registration to the absence of latent infrared radiation has been used regular candle, and registration is the lack of high-frequency electromagnetic radiation – a neon lamp.
Primary energy source – the battery was connected using a relatively thin wire, which eliminates the possibility of transmitting large amounts of energy to the load.
If You have already seen this video, you may have noticed that the reactor will emit large amounts of heat. Meanwhile, the power of the reactor is carried out from a battery made up of four elements normal alkaline AAA batteries. The current is controlled with the help of ammeter, reaches a value of only 0.35 ampere. Simple calculations allow us to conclude that the efficiency of the installation exceeds 100% as the battery is relatively small.
But, let's see.
Original data:
Water — 500 grams
The initial solution temperature is 22°C
The final solution temperature — 93°C
The time taken to heat — 720 seconds.
The heat capacity of water is 4.2 j/Gram*°C
How much was allocated to energy?
4,2*500 (g) * 71 (°C) = 149100 (j)
The power required for this?
149100 (j) / 720 (h) ≈ 207 (Watts)
If the battery was even a lithium-ion and was given the power it would generate a current:
207 (W) / (3,6 * 4) (V) ≈ 14 (Amp)
It is clear that for such high currents would need wire of a larger cross-section than those that were used.
Measurements of the battery current, showed a 0.35 ampere. While under load were recorded voltage of 4.82 Volts.
Calculate the power, given to a battery:
4,82 V (Volts) * 0,35(Amps) ≈ 1,7 (Watts)
It remains to calculate the efficiency:
207 (Watts) / 1,7 (Watts) ≈ 122 (Times)
Hasten to answer the question about the prospects of this technology. Not yet managed to provide continuous operation of the reactor because of the rapid destruction of the membrane. The average time of work of the rector in 35 minutes. The record is 1 hour 23 minutes. So, to connect the reactor to the radiator until you get it. published
P. S. And remember, only by changing their consumption — together we change the world! ©
Join us in Facebook , Vkontakte, Odnoklassniki
Source: oldoctober.com/ru/cold_fusion/
The reason for this mass, such as: economic, technical and even political.
But let's start from the beginning.
Millions of years the planet Earth with various living organisms recycled carbon dioxide into coal, oil and natural gas. To turn all these natural resources back to carbon dioxide was relatively easy, just had to learn to use fire. Actually, this humanity and this has been so far.
With the development of science and technology, there were power converters, allowing the use of the energy of water, sun, wind, geothermal sources and even the energy of sea waves. But these converters have several disadvantages, chief of which is dependence on the forces of nature.
Mankind's attempts to harness the energy of fissile atomic nucleus from time to time was a success, but it was not less harmful to the environment than conventional thermal power plant.
What awaits us in the future?
In the distant future, we expect new technologies for producing energy through reactors, so-called, cold fusion. And in the near future, we plan not expect anything good.
The first and the main obstacle to this economic interest. Large capital conducts business in accordance with its strategic plans, in which there is no room for new technologies. It is foolish to withdraw money from the business when revenues are growing all the time, by leaps and bounds.
So, while the cost of oil and gas does not collapse so that mining will become unprofitable, one should not expect breakthrough in the field of new energy technologies. But prices are unlikely to collapse, as resources are depleted all the time, and this is the opposite of pushing up prices.
Why scientists don't do research in this direction?
Scientists doing research in that direction, for which funds are allocated.
For example, millions of dollars are spent every year on developing new drugs for cancer treatment. But, the funds allocate large pharmaceutical companies who need to sell drugs for cancer patients, not to cure patients, thereby destroying your well-oiled business.
The same thing happened with generators running on alternative fuels. In fact, research in the field of thermonuclear fusion (tokamak, Laser fusion) allocated huge sums for which it is fed by thousands of scientists. For half a century, we are experimenting, and who and now there. Whether scientists do not fundamentally want to change the doctrine, or patiently wait until the oil runs...
So here are some very useful for the companies technology can be harmful not only to big capital, but for the entire global economic system. After all for anybody not a secret that the economies of some countries are entirely dependent on hydrocarbon production.
So, only a revolution in energy, which will take place in the distant future, can radically change this cycle.
Enthusiasts why not build a compact power plant based on cold nuclear fusion?
Most of the known reactors has exist only in the form of a small laboratory installations, which are often not sufficiently detailed. In addition, the materials and the reagents used for the construction of such reactors is difficult to get someone without access to scientific laboratories. For example, You want to get a bottle of heavy water, and you will begin to suspect uranium enrichment.
But if you really want, you can now try at least to experiment with table reactors like reactors Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons or Andrea Rossi.
The background
The history of this experiment stems from a chance meeting at the resort. Then I took regular batteries, and my wife went to the store. There, he saw the shelf life AA Energizer items (approximately ten years), I tried to joke, remembering how Hodja Nasreddin promised to the Emir for 10 years to teach the donkey to talk.
He Haj Nasreddin commented on this: "In ten years, or the donkey dies, or the Emir..." standing Next to the buyer reacted to the joke. As it turned out, they were engineer with Russian roots. Word for word, and we have already discussed the problems of world energy. The conversation continues over a glass of tea. In the discussion, a new acquaintance told me an interesting story. The essence of the story is that, in the past, my counterpart worked in the laboratory for the development of desalination plants for Australia. The installation of these work on the basis of reverse osmosis filters. So, in one experiment, they received an anomalous heat production, with concomitant destruction of the membrane. Then I did not attach much importance, but then this idea came back to mind and began to haunt me. As a result, I had a ball – was engaged in experimental physics.
The reactor of cold nuclear fusion in a glass of water
After a series of experiments was built a very efficient reactor based on nanomembranes and resonator, original design.
The video shows the operation of the reactor, has with the release of abnormally high amounts of heat. Subscribe to our youtube channel www.youtube.com/channel/UCXd71u0w04qcwk32c8kY2BA/videos
To convince skeptics of the authenticity of the experiment, were taken some measures. In particular, the plant was collected on a glass stand. For registration to the absence of latent infrared radiation has been used regular candle, and registration is the lack of high-frequency electromagnetic radiation – a neon lamp.
Primary energy source – the battery was connected using a relatively thin wire, which eliminates the possibility of transmitting large amounts of energy to the load.
If You have already seen this video, you may have noticed that the reactor will emit large amounts of heat. Meanwhile, the power of the reactor is carried out from a battery made up of four elements normal alkaline AAA batteries. The current is controlled with the help of ammeter, reaches a value of only 0.35 ampere. Simple calculations allow us to conclude that the efficiency of the installation exceeds 100% as the battery is relatively small.
But, let's see.
Original data:
Water — 500 grams
The initial solution temperature is 22°C
The final solution temperature — 93°C
The time taken to heat — 720 seconds.
The heat capacity of water is 4.2 j/Gram*°C
How much was allocated to energy?
4,2*500 (g) * 71 (°C) = 149100 (j)
The power required for this?
149100 (j) / 720 (h) ≈ 207 (Watts)
If the battery was even a lithium-ion and was given the power it would generate a current:
207 (W) / (3,6 * 4) (V) ≈ 14 (Amp)
It is clear that for such high currents would need wire of a larger cross-section than those that were used.
Measurements of the battery current, showed a 0.35 ampere. While under load were recorded voltage of 4.82 Volts.
Calculate the power, given to a battery:
4,82 V (Volts) * 0,35(Amps) ≈ 1,7 (Watts)
It remains to calculate the efficiency:
207 (Watts) / 1,7 (Watts) ≈ 122 (Times)
Hasten to answer the question about the prospects of this technology. Not yet managed to provide continuous operation of the reactor because of the rapid destruction of the membrane. The average time of work of the rector in 35 minutes. The record is 1 hour 23 minutes. So, to connect the reactor to the radiator until you get it. published
P. S. And remember, only by changing their consumption — together we change the world! ©
Join us in Facebook , Vkontakte, Odnoklassniki
Source: oldoctober.com/ru/cold_fusion/