Reviews of the bethub.org project, contacts, description, investigation

Review of the bethub project, whether to trust their authors, review and description of the service.


The Kapper project “Bet Hub” offers daily free predictions of match outcomes, educational articles, sports analytics and BC rating. Reviews about Bethub org on thematic resources are often neutral. The project didn't go black.

Description
The site "Bet Hub" offers forecasts and analytics of professional cappers. The service uses algorithms to process statistics and assess the likelihood of a sporting event. The site gives more than 10 predictions daily on the homepage and telegram channel Betting Tips & Predictions.
The authors of the project publish news and a list of referral links of reliable bookmakers. For beginners in betting, there is a transcript of events and bet designations.

Contacts
Project contacts:

• Review – www.kaper.pro/articles/sports-sites/reviews-o-bethub-org-all-truth-o-bethhab/
• Official page - Bethub org/
• Email - q@bethub.bet
• Phone in Hong Kong +852(8121)01-80
• Group VK – vk.com/bethub
• Twitter - twitter.com/bethub_org
• Telegram channel - t.me/morningbet
• Bot - @BetHubot

Investigation
The authors of the analytical project “Bet Hub” publish sports forecasts, news and articles about betting on the official website and in popular social networks. The average passability of matches with odds of 1.6-1.8 usually does not exceed 50%. The project owners give forecasts of sports events for free, up to 10 pieces a day. The site does not publish betting statistics and does not provide income guarantees.

Reviews
Customers of the resource "Bet Hub" in the comments note the low passability of matches. On a losing streak at a distance, the bank sometimes goes into the red.
In addition, the project Bethub org criticized for the lack of statistics and the inability to assess the real passability of matches.



Conclusion
Of the advantages of the site Bethub org can be noted:

• Free predictions on the main page and on social networks;
• convenient interface of the resource;
• compliance of the coefficients of the BC line;
• educational material and sports news;
• sending matches using a bot on Telegram.

Cons of the project:

• low permeability and coefficients;
• Lack of verified statistics;
• Negative reviews about Bethub org on thematic forums;
• Intrusive advertising of bookmakers.

There is no history of bets on the official website, therefore, the real passability of matches is difficult to assess. But the service can be useful in analyzing sporting events.
Source of article