30
Danish scientists have found out whether to wear a mask on the street
Masks have become familiar to us. Now, going out to the store or for a walk, we always take with us keys, phone, wallet and... mask. Should I wear a mask on the street? Danish scientists are seriously puzzled by this question. It’s not just a matter of convenience.
The vast amount of contradictory information we receive from many sources is very confusing. It seems that doctors should know all the features of antiviral protection, but no. We see considerable disagreement here about masks, gloves, antiseptics.
Some argue that any masks are a good protection, and it is better to only have specialized respirators, which you will not find in a pharmacy. But there are doctors who are absolutely sure that the usual mask does not make sense at all.
And yet most agree that wearing a mask protects us from the coronavirus. But what is the effectiveness of this tool and when exactly should you wear it? Of course, you should be aware of all the news, but you also need to use banal logic. Based on our knowledge of the spread of virus It is important to consider situations where the mask is required.
For example, crowded Like shops, you can't keep a distance, and people can be decent. There are already markups in almost any food, but who observes them? In this case, logic tells us that the mask must be worn. But on the street, when there is no living soul within a radius of 200 meters? You can wear a mask if it gives you mental peace of mind, but it doesn’t make much sense.
What have Danish scientists discovered? Researchers at the University of Copenhagen, through a series of experiments and analysis of statistical data, came to the conclusion that wearing a mask. reduces the risk by 15-20%. It is worth mentioning that the Danes who took part in the experiment spent about 3 hours in a large crowd of people every day. The first group wore masks and the second did not.
755850
According to the results, in the first group there were 1.8% infected, and in the second - 2.1%. Not very comforting results, is it? The difference is insignificant, although it still exists. The experiment was conducted May 2020.
All experiments concerning coronavirus are quite ambiguous. Why? At least because the numbers change from day to day. Such active statistical changes are difficult to analyze and track patterns in them. Many establishments already Penalties for those who do not wear masks. This is already a good reason to wear it. But on the street look at the situation: if it is rush hour and there are a lot of people, you can use additional protection.
The vast amount of contradictory information we receive from many sources is very confusing. It seems that doctors should know all the features of antiviral protection, but no. We see considerable disagreement here about masks, gloves, antiseptics.
Some argue that any masks are a good protection, and it is better to only have specialized respirators, which you will not find in a pharmacy. But there are doctors who are absolutely sure that the usual mask does not make sense at all.
And yet most agree that wearing a mask protects us from the coronavirus. But what is the effectiveness of this tool and when exactly should you wear it? Of course, you should be aware of all the news, but you also need to use banal logic. Based on our knowledge of the spread of virus It is important to consider situations where the mask is required.
For example, crowded Like shops, you can't keep a distance, and people can be decent. There are already markups in almost any food, but who observes them? In this case, logic tells us that the mask must be worn. But on the street, when there is no living soul within a radius of 200 meters? You can wear a mask if it gives you mental peace of mind, but it doesn’t make much sense.
What have Danish scientists discovered? Researchers at the University of Copenhagen, through a series of experiments and analysis of statistical data, came to the conclusion that wearing a mask. reduces the risk by 15-20%. It is worth mentioning that the Danes who took part in the experiment spent about 3 hours in a large crowd of people every day. The first group wore masks and the second did not.
755850
According to the results, in the first group there were 1.8% infected, and in the second - 2.1%. Not very comforting results, is it? The difference is insignificant, although it still exists. The experiment was conducted May 2020.
All experiments concerning coronavirus are quite ambiguous. Why? At least because the numbers change from day to day. Such active statistical changes are difficult to analyze and track patterns in them. Many establishments already Penalties for those who do not wear masks. This is already a good reason to wear it. But on the street look at the situation: if it is rush hour and there are a lot of people, you can use additional protection.
Replacement of purchased sweets and how to make them at home with children
The first picture you see will tell you if you can live alone.