ANO "Forensic expert". Professional opinions

The range of successfully solved problems.
The court's objective decision is the result of coordinated work of several professional bodies.
And one of those sodexa.ru — center expert, professionally producing a wide range of forensic investigations and examinations. With decades of experience in their field, the center has become a strong link in the chain of protection of justice and the interests of its clients in such areas as:

• forensic investigation and examination (handwriting, requisite, fingerprint examination);
• speech study (in litigation regarding libel, denigration of the dignity, plagiarism, etc.);
• lab chemical. examination;
• medical and pathological examination (assault; causes of death; facts toxic poisoning, etc.);
• psychological and psychiatric detention.

And also the truth in such a relevant and often controversial issues as: genetic analysis of paternity and maternity; valuation of real estate and vehicles; emergency, etc.

The scope and the principles upon which ANO "Forensic expert".High class and extensive knowledge of the employees of the Autonomous nonprofit organization "legal expert", allow them to give authoritative opinions on the following areas:

• execution of judicial studies and legal opinions for queries of official bodies trial;
• implementation of studies and examinations for private clients and official representatives of the defense in court;
• the results of reviews of expert opinions;
• consultations for private customers, legal organizations and individuals, on matters within the competence of ANO "Forensic expert". In particular on the norms of assignment and sequencing of the implementation of forensic examinations;
• the centre's experts can also participate directly in court proceedings, bringing its conclusion to the court, the competent expository form.

We believe that being active participants in the process of making important decisions, men simply do not have the right to possess due: professionalism and impartiality of their assessments, and readiness for mutually fair collaboration.