358
Americans do not like our radar
The US military does not like radar "Voronezh»
Commissioning of a missile defense radar in Armavir, the US military was seen as destabilizing the balance of strategic forces.
The Pentagon expressed concern about Moscow's actions in the field of missile defense. On the one hand, it calls on the US to disarm, and on the other - actively strengthening its borders antimissile systems, writes The Washington Free Beacon. Officials from the US military announced that a new radar station (radar) missile defense (BMD) in Armavir increases the total number of missile defense and Russia is a threat to the security of America and Europe.
"Russian does not agree with the placement of US missile defense funds established in Europe, but at the same time create their own network of agents for the detection of missile attack", - quotes the edition of US officials.
The US military is also concerned about the creation of a Russian missile PC-24 "yars", which was tested in September. According to them, the test results indicate it as a medium-range missiles. This violates a treaty between the USSR and the United States by 1987 on the elimination of such missiles. However, the Russian side said that the range of "Yarsa" (more than 5500 km) higher than medium-range missiles, and can not be regarded as a breach of contract.
Dissatisfaction with the US military is compounded by a statement of Barack Obama on the reduction of offensive arsenal in the framework of agreements with Russia. He said this in September in Berlin. Earlier, the US government waived the fourth phase of the establishment of the missile defense in Europe. According to the Deputy Secretary of Defense Alexander Vershbow, the savings will be directed, in particular, to improve the accuracy of the parameters of missile interceptors, which will go into service of US bases in Poland and Romania.
I want to answer ...
All these "concerns" can just ask a simple question - you can and can not we? Since when thinking about your safety, we need to consult with foreign "partners"? Yes, such that sleep and see a picture of the environment of a new Russian military bases as in the good old days "of the Cold War».
And Russia is not the first anti-missile controversy began to build "muscle." In the end, do not we have initiated actions of the USA to establish a European missile defense system, which is designed, supposedly, to neutralize the missile threat from "rogue states." Are not we pushing "big brother" to twist arms at younger brothers on the block NATO, that is to say from its partners in order to get them to consent to such action. And there are obvious questions that objective answers are not in your favor and gentlemen, you can ask a lot.
Therefore, dear, it is better not to express its "concern", but rather look for contact consensus on these issues. So I said at the time the first and last president of the USSR Mikhail Gorbachev lamented.
Author Anatoly Sokolov
From: topwar.ru/35665-amerikanskim-voenny...s-voronezh.html
Source:
Commissioning of a missile defense radar in Armavir, the US military was seen as destabilizing the balance of strategic forces.
The Pentagon expressed concern about Moscow's actions in the field of missile defense. On the one hand, it calls on the US to disarm, and on the other - actively strengthening its borders antimissile systems, writes The Washington Free Beacon. Officials from the US military announced that a new radar station (radar) missile defense (BMD) in Armavir increases the total number of missile defense and Russia is a threat to the security of America and Europe.
"Russian does not agree with the placement of US missile defense funds established in Europe, but at the same time create their own network of agents for the detection of missile attack", - quotes the edition of US officials.
The US military is also concerned about the creation of a Russian missile PC-24 "yars", which was tested in September. According to them, the test results indicate it as a medium-range missiles. This violates a treaty between the USSR and the United States by 1987 on the elimination of such missiles. However, the Russian side said that the range of "Yarsa" (more than 5500 km) higher than medium-range missiles, and can not be regarded as a breach of contract.
Dissatisfaction with the US military is compounded by a statement of Barack Obama on the reduction of offensive arsenal in the framework of agreements with Russia. He said this in September in Berlin. Earlier, the US government waived the fourth phase of the establishment of the missile defense in Europe. According to the Deputy Secretary of Defense Alexander Vershbow, the savings will be directed, in particular, to improve the accuracy of the parameters of missile interceptors, which will go into service of US bases in Poland and Romania.
I want to answer ...
All these "concerns" can just ask a simple question - you can and can not we? Since when thinking about your safety, we need to consult with foreign "partners"? Yes, such that sleep and see a picture of the environment of a new Russian military bases as in the good old days "of the Cold War».
And Russia is not the first anti-missile controversy began to build "muscle." In the end, do not we have initiated actions of the USA to establish a European missile defense system, which is designed, supposedly, to neutralize the missile threat from "rogue states." Are not we pushing "big brother" to twist arms at younger brothers on the block NATO, that is to say from its partners in order to get them to consent to such action. And there are obvious questions that objective answers are not in your favor and gentlemen, you can ask a lot.
Therefore, dear, it is better not to express its "concern", but rather look for contact consensus on these issues. So I said at the time the first and last president of the USSR Mikhail Gorbachev lamented.
Author Anatoly Sokolov
From: topwar.ru/35665-amerikanskim-voenny...s-voronezh.html
Source:
