A strong player in poker do not give him a prize

The oldest London playhouse Crockfords refused to part with the 10 MILLION DOLLARS, who won the 35-year-old Californian Phil Ivey. He is considered the strongest poker player.
The man tore off large sum in the high-stakes baccarat at the end of leta.Vse actions were recorded on ten cameras !!!
At first it was suspected of fraud. Investigators carefully studied records from surveillance cameras, maps, who played Phil Ivey, and even his shoes, but no evidence was found. Now the casino simply refuses to pay the money to him, offering to return only the amount he has invested in the rate.
This is still a casino refuses to pay winnings to Phil.
Ivey himself does not want is a situation kommentirovat.No it is ...
No wonder they say sometimes, you want to win at the casino - buy yourself a casino.



That's right about the reputation ... or maybe everything is easier
Soon just give tips. (As for example, many banks sypyatsya) .Hoteli more work ... denezhek cut down ... And then went PHIL ..))))

[b] I will add the very history of winning
Ivey played the first 50 thousand pounds for the stake (the rally lasts less than a minute), then the managers have allowed him to increase the rate to 150 thousand pounds. At the beginning of the session the player went to a minus half a million pounds, but eventually fought to the end of the first night won 2, 3 million pounds.

The next day he returned and continued to destroy the casino. After playing for about seven hours over two days, Phil decided to break off at around 7, 3 million pounds. Winning, he asked to be transferred to your bank account. Managers Player assured that the transfer will be made on Tuesday, 28 of August. After Ivey left the club, the casino immediately launched an investigation and informed the Gambling Commission that freezes the payment of a prize Phil Ivey.

Crockfords Casino is now owned by a Malaysian corporation Genting (which, incidentally, are increasingly entering the market organization of poker tournaments). Investigators company arrived in London from Kuala Lumpur. First of all casino employees were questioned and the dealer handing out cards during a game session. There were also carefully examined the records of all surveillance cameras used maps and Shuz. No evidence of collusion casino employees, as well as the labels on the cards or shuze could not be found. Ivey himself, according to the source of the newspaper, the maps are not touched. However, in the course of the proceedings it became clear that the player was companion in the black list of other casino in the same area of ​​London.
So it continued with the time history will be ...

Source: