555
Tattoo for the cat (18 photos)
The British newspaper "The Mirror" hits the alarm in Moscow bald cat - sphinx stuffed tattooed on his chest! Three hours cat breed Miki Canadian Bald was under anesthesia on the desktop tattoo, which depicted an animal Tutankhamun. Girl-owner commented on his decision simply and frankly: "I wanted something radically new!" Of course, the British - great friends of animals - called such an act barbaric: "We are against the use of animals as an accessory, it is disrespectful to the animal!»
On the one hand, the tattoo - a painful thing, but in fact very few people opposed the removal of the testicles, and even the elimination Contrary claws, which is a real manifestation of anti-humanism. On the other hand, had never seen a cat who would consider themselves in the mirror, and therefore difficult to imagine the cat, who would not like his appearance with tattoos in the form of Tutankhamun
Psychology can be explained by the owner of a cat: the cat is 2000 dollars, and such a loss to the personal budget instills the idea of an absolute right to do with their property anything. Accordingly, all the others who are suitable for cats is not tattooing, compassionate sigh: "Ah, well kisonke hurt! .." It is believed that hairless cats very thick skin, so much inconvenience cat does not feel, and therefore, we are talking only about aesthetics and ethics: Is it possible to use your property to live completely on your own? And if "no", where the border between the will of the owner and the animal's own desires?
via
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Source:
On the one hand, the tattoo - a painful thing, but in fact very few people opposed the removal of the testicles, and even the elimination Contrary claws, which is a real manifestation of anti-humanism. On the other hand, had never seen a cat who would consider themselves in the mirror, and therefore difficult to imagine the cat, who would not like his appearance with tattoos in the form of Tutankhamun
Psychology can be explained by the owner of a cat: the cat is 2000 dollars, and such a loss to the personal budget instills the idea of an absolute right to do with their property anything. Accordingly, all the others who are suitable for cats is not tattooing, compassionate sigh: "Ah, well kisonke hurt! .." It is believed that hairless cats very thick skin, so much inconvenience cat does not feel, and therefore, we are talking only about aesthetics and ethics: Is it possible to use your property to live completely on your own? And if "no", where the border between the will of the owner and the animal's own desires?
via
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Source: