If early-2000s sci-fi was to be believed, by 2026 the school backpack should have already given way to a jetpack, and tests should have been downloaded directly into the brain. Reality turned out to be less spectacular. But far stranger: a child can get an answer to almost any question in a minute, ask an AI to explain fractions, and watch a lecture by a teacher from the other end of the country. And this raises an awkward question — what should school actually teach if there is already more information around than a human can possibly digest?
Material prepared in cooperation with "Online School No. 1".*
*Based on the results of the 2019 All-Russian competition "100 Best Schools in Russia" in the category "Best Distance Learning School" in terms of satisfaction with the quality of education.
Not so long ago, the educational trajectory looked fairly straightforward. School provided the basics, university provided a specialty, after which a person could work in roughly the same field for decades. Today, this model fails more and more often.
Not because the multiplication table suddenly became useless or children no longer need literature. Quite the contrary: fundamental knowledge remains the foundation. Something else has changed — the attitude towards information itself.
A fact that previously required flipping through an encyclopedia or going to the library can now be found in a few seconds. The problem has shifted. You don't just need to find the answer, but to understand: can it even be trusted? Who wrote it? What is the conclusion based on? Are cause and effect mixed up? Or maybe an AI simply generated a convincing-sounding text?
Therefore, the school of the future is not a place where they try to load the maximum amount of information into a child's head. Rather, it is a training ground where they learn to handle knowledge: to search for it, verify it, compare it, and use it.
There is a familiar school pattern: "Did you do your homework?", "And math?", "Did you pack your uniform for tomorrow?". A parent turns into a small airport dispatcher, giving orders until evening.
The problem reveals itself later. No one is standing nearby anymore, but the person still expects someone to remind them about a deadline.
It is better to cultivate independence gradually. For example, a younger student can check off completed tasks in a paper schedule themselves. An older child can already be entrusted with a week-long project: break it down into stages, choose time to work, and check what's left themselves.
A simple experiment: instead of the daily "sit down to do your homework", invite the child to choose study times for the next five days themselves and write them down. At the end of the week, calmly look at what happened. Without trial and a prosecutor.
This is how the connection between a decision and a result appears. Not instantly. Sometimes the schedule will fall apart by Tuesday — that is also part of learning.
Children grow up in an environment where a confidently sounding answer guarantees nothing yet. A nice video can contain an error. A popular post can be a manipulation. Even a carefully formulated answer from a digital assistant should be checked.
Therefore, a useful parent question is not "did you memorize it?", but "why do you think this is true?".
You can compare two articles on the same topic. Find the primary source of a figure. Look at the publication date. Separate the author's opinion from a verifiable fact. Such exercises look much more modest than a lesson with an interactive whiteboard, but they give the child the habit of not believing the first convincing explanation.
Technology is changing work, but has not yet canceled colleagues, clients, teachers, and people who think completely differently from us.
A child will benefit from the ability to explain their idea without ten minutes of agonizing "well, basically", to hear someone else's argument, to ask a question, to distribute roles in a team, and not turn any disagreement into a personal war.
This is hard to learn from a textbook. Practice is needed: joint projects, discussions, presentations, clubs, situations where they have to negotiate.
Moreover, a good team experience is not when an adult has already decided everything for the children. Sometimes it's useful for them to figure out themselves who is doing the presentation, who is looking for material, and why the person who promised to design the last two slides suddenly disappeared the evening before the deadline. Relatable.
A resilient child also gets angry, fears tests, gets upset over a bad grade, and may return from school wanting to close the door and see no one. The difference is in another aspect: the experience does not knock them out of life for long.
A useful skill is to notice your state and understand what to do with it. After a hard school day, a walk will help one child, twenty minutes of silence another, and a third needs to first tell someone how much their classmate at the neighboring desk annoyed them.
The fear of mistakes, conflicts, exam anxiety, and the constant feeling that you are worse than others affect studies particularly strongly. If a child lives in such a state for months, the demand to "just pull yourself together" is unlikely to work.
Previously, a schoolchild's poor well-being was often blamed on laziness, character, or being spoiled. Now parents are much more likely to notice the connection between emotional state, motivation, and academic results.
At "Online School No. 1", separate support tools are dedicated to this topic. Practicing psychologist Kira Goldshtein has prepared the book "Non-Children's Problems. How to Help a Child Survive School". It deals with conflicts in class, the fear of mistakes, anxiety before tests, and other situations faced by students and their parents.
There is also the audio project "Meditations for Schoolchildren" with short practices for reducing tension and restoring concentration. Such format can be used, for example, before a difficult lesson, an exam, or in the evening after an emotionally intense day.
This is not a magic "make the child calm" button. And that's good. The task is much more realistic — to give them several ways to cope with stress, other than the habitual "endure".
Distance learning was long perceived as a backup airfield: an option in case of relocation, illness, or other circumstances. But the online format has its own logic, which is noticeably different from a regular classroom.
The main difference is the ability to change the pace.
If a topic was difficult, you can return to the material. If a child understood it faster, they don't have to sit for another week with the feeling that the lesson is moving at a 0.75 speed. This is especially noticeable where students differ greatly in their perception pace.
At "Online School No. 1", priority is given to live classes with teachers in mini-classes. Students receive feedback from teachers, and a personal curator helps organize the learning process and stays in touch with the child and parents.
At the same time, materials are also available on the digital platform: you can independently repeat topics, re-watch video lessons, and work with the electronic library. The curriculum is drawn up taking into account the Federal State Educational Standards (FGOS), and graduates receive a state-issued certificate.
A difficult topic can be repeated as many times as necessary. Not because the student is "falling behind", but because people generally need different amounts of time to master material.
Mini-classes and curator support help avoid the situation where a teacher has to simultaneously hold the attention of three dozen students.
The online format itself requires planning classes, keeping track of the schedule, and gradually taking on more responsibility for your studies.
The school has a psychological service. Both students and parents can apply for a consultation — for example, if stress, anxiety, or communication problems are already starting to interfere with studies.
Interest clubs, extracurricular activities, and student communities operate for socialization. That is, online learning does not necessarily mean living alone with a laptop.
Predicting the professions of 2036 is an ungrateful task. Perhaps some of the familiar specialties will change beyond recognition. New tools, new requirements, and new ways of learning will appear.
But there is a set of skills that is unlikely to lose value along with the next technology update.
And there is an amusing paradox here. The more technological education becomes, the more noticeable the value of very human qualities: curiosity, independence, the ability to doubt, negotiate, and start over after a mistake.
An anti-gravity skateboard might not be needed by a child just yet. But the ability not to get confused when the usual rules change again — almost certainly.