Russia-China. Still have doubts? Bashny.Net

... The very first speech of US President Obama during his "Asian tour" managed to otlichnenko. Speaking to the Japanese audience, this wonderful man and a Nobel Peace Prize winner promised her to take a pro-Japanese stance - including military intervention - in a territorial dispute with China.

There is a feeling that his eyes widened at the same time not only the Chinese. No, what the United States is objectively interested in maximizing "containment" is not only in Russia, especially in the vital Asian markets for them - no doubt the past, no one called. On this occasion, the head of the Pentagon had enough tough talk and pale appearance at a meeting with his Chinese counterpart during a visit to Beijing.

But such frank here present preparing for the visit to China Russian President Vladimir Putin did not expect, perhaps, no one at all. For America is clearly not strong enough to "isolate" Russia even one, and if it tries to boot to isolate more, and China, it is once more to remind the medical staff isolation from the dominant of the patient in the appropriate type of medical facility. Such patients also continues to be quite a sovereign and independent in his room, and at the approach of men in white coats is even able to show them all on its hegemony.

Well, seriously, it is, ladies and gentlemen - not funny.

Here in fact the whole thing is not in the personalities of the American top managers. Everyone knows that whoever is personally and the party acting head of the United States, it will still maintain the same policy. Consequently, the above processes are not dismantled individual and the system, and "sick" (in our picture of the world) is not only the current US administration, and the global strategy of the nuclear superpower at all. What here in FIG jokes.

But there is a caveat. In the logic of the world that existed in the West, the past 70 years - everything is logical. All the strange actions of Obama - in the case.

... The very existence of the State United States after World War II was "locked up" solely under the domination and hegemony. Before the collapse of the opposing "dominant pro-American" hegemony of the Eastern bloc, this was carried out in "the West" and subordinates them to Third World states. And after the death of the Soviet system was a bold attempt to pull it to the entire human civilization. And it really is not a joke, because it was under this model in the US built and arranged everything, including their own US economy, the global dominance of the dollar, the contents of a monstrously expensive military-political machine, and other, other, other.

And if you look at the situation from this point, it becomes clear behavior of the "patient." Any global "strengthening" political whether economic whether military there - it does not matter, Russia Whether China Whether or some "conditional power X" any conditional "eastern revenge" means for the United States is not local tactical "retreat" .

It means the collapse of the entire arrayed decades "the American model of the world": simply because in a world without "global American hegemony," the United States simply does not exist. And the scenarios in terms of the "model" provides only three: a "global dominance" or a modified "cluster system" (conditional "Russian-Chinese bloc" against the conventional "pro-American", which of course is not so good, but at least it allows you to dominate the maximum possible number of satellite countries), or - with inevitable ruin.

And if the system under any pretexts up to the "defense of the free world" is no longer protected by these very countries to milk her - she simply loses the right to exist. And then everything starts to crumble, including the monetary system is still based on the already half-forgotten Bretton Woods agreement.

Therefore, the American political instinct - to rush to "contain" and "pacify" any powers, regardless of whether there is a corresponding scale of America usmiryalka or not.

That is why we can safely agree with professional psychiatrists who say that "any madness has its own system," and any of schizophrenia with the "internal point of view" is more than logical.

Just you and I and these people deserve to be - in many ways we see the world

--img2--

Source: rushor.com