Star style Bashny.Net

We appreciate the stars. We fanateem of them, we think about them, admire them. How can you not admire such beautiful green eyes, a deep inner beauty and dignity, and thus the external splendor and elegance? Stars embody all that we call a dream - including the style. Therefore, sometimes it seems that celebrity - it's just gloss and shine, besides completely unchanged over time. That is: diamonds, diamonds, diamonds - that's an irreplaceable symbol of stellar style ... And besides external glamor in style star's nothing ... But is it?





Old Hollywood
The style of old Hollywood - all of aristocratic fashion of the 19th century. A huge hat and gloves above the elbow, diamonds in his ears and open arms - so imagine filmmakers beautiful before the war and after it. Long gloves, lighter fabrics and deep cut with brightly painted eyes - this was a must have, by which create the image of a star.

Ava Gardner - a vivid example. Its bright emotion even more highlight its bright way, and long gloves are very well suited to its dramatic and expressive gesture.


Silk, chiffon, organza ... This style all his life stuck Elizabeth Taylor. What would be a simple cut was not on her dress - diamonds and gloves required. This allowed Liz to not lose yourself - otherwise it would have just confused in their desires.










Gina Lollobrigida also wore gloves, even though it would seem - why they would need it with modern dress? Here she is strict - which was in life.


Sophia Loren is also adhered to this style - especially in the youth. In her private life, she played the queen of pleasure, which is why the crown looks so natural in it. Royal life style then in general was typical for the stars - they were regarded as celestials who inadvertently came down to earth and which never touched mortals. Sophie and is still recognized by the Queen.




Vivien Leigh always gave preference to this style: so beautiful and so inaccessible and gloves only emphasize that. Beauty and inaccessibility was typical for her in life - Lee had a stubborn and irascible character, and thus did everything for that to play better and look better - so the gloves never left her wardrobe.


Apart in this series is Marlene Dietrich, who in creating his style preferred the 30s of the 20th century. Suitable for cutting nature of the Marlene. By the way, mind you, none of those stars almost never photographed in outerwear, and even allowed herself such that happening is somehow in a sable coat and other grand, expensive clothes, because nothing had the right to break the star style.


And as far as sharply opposed to all this starry chic Audrey Hepburn. Next to the queen and grand ladies Audrey looks simple and cute girl from across the street - shirts, sweaters, pants, coats ... She could afford the clothes, as they have a strong personality that no T-shirts could not extinguish. It was with her in the fashion among the celebrities photographed on the top and casual clothing, and the stars came down to earth a bit.










Our time
Time passed and finally in the new century - the complete and final victory of the style of Audrey Hepburn !!! Celebrities photographed in the same, and what living, unless something else is required by the role. And even their festive outfits have become much easier.

Eva Longoria's no hats, no gloves, no diamonds in the ears and on the neck, just a simple black dress Coco Chanel once coined for everyday wear ... But she just shines with Eve - and her stellar smile and becomes a new star-style.


Madonna and Lady Gaga shocking audiences style street bikers. No Star light is not observed even close. However, that does not stop the fans.


Scarlett Johansson on a swing. All such golden and shiny ... It seems that the elves have changed in Hollywood queens and princesses ...


Vivienne loves Vesvud shocking - and, again, did not have in her royal attire. And what else can you expect from a woman who said, "Vulgarity - a life"?


Victoria Beckham in a girlish platitse ... Looks nice, and the identity of Victoria immediately obvious:)))


Dita Von Teese is known for his love of vintage - in their costumes in the style of the early 20th century, it sometimes looks like an anachronism.


Iman came closest to the king along, but ... pants! naked neck! bare hands! and hats also not ... Perhaps there really is nothing of kings, but a lot of the most Iman.


Kate Hudson in a simple dress. And rightly so, the main thing - the person Kate.


The same shows Catherine Zeta-Jones. Why do we need clothes, or some hat there, if there is Kate?


Sandra Bullock - in coat and dress, the same neat and reserved as she was.


Uma Thurman - very elegant. It is perfectly suited to her character.


Fergie opted for a brighter image - but she lives in a bright and crazy.


Heidi Klum in a T-shirt. Being a girl from next door - could the stars afford it even though 50 years ago?


Look at the very first picture. Now to the one below this paragraph. Wow a difference, right? But that image, and this - just a dream. And when I look at them, I once again convinced - fashion is changing, but the identity is eternal.